Skip to main content

Is gleif.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) Reviews

gleif.org favicon

Is gleif.org Safe? Security Analysis for Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)

Check if gleif.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceSwitzerlandmedium
jQueryLodashMathJaxCookiebotTwitter Universal Website Tag+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:27:26 PM
76
Security Score
LOW RISK

AI Summary

The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) operates as a non-profit organization dedicated to managing and ensuring the integrity of the Global Legal Entity Identifier System. It serves a critical role in the financial and regulatory sectors by providing standardized entity identification services worldwide. The organization is well-positioned globally, supported by regulatory oversight bodies such as the Financial Stability Board and the Regulatory Oversight Committee, and offers a range of services including LEI issuance, data quality management, and digital verification through verifiable LEIs (vLEI). Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Lodash, MathJax, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. It integrates security features such as Google reCAPTCHA and Twitter tracking pixels, and demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization. The site is well-structured with comprehensive content and clear navigation, reflecting a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements multiple security headers, and holds ISO 20000 certification, indicating adherence to IT service management standards. However, there is no publicly available security.txt or explicit incident response contact, which could be improved to enhance transparency and vulnerability management. Overall, the website presents a high level of trustworthiness and professionalism, with strong compliance and business credibility. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection and does not detract from the legitimacy of the organization. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security.txt file, enhancing incident response disclosures, and maintaining regular audits of third-party components to sustain security posture.

Detected Technologies

jQueryLodashMathJaxCookiebotTwitter Universal Website TagGoogle reCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GLEIF holds a unique market position as the global authority for Legal Entity Identifiers, serving financial institutions, regulators, and businesses requiring standardized entity identification. Its non-profit business model focuses on providing open data and accreditation services, supported by regulatory frameworks. The organization benefits from strong partnerships and oversight, enhancing its credibility and reach. Revenue streams likely include service fees for LEI issuance and data services. The target customer segments are global financial markets and regulatory bodies. Growth indicators include expanding digital identity solutions such as the verifiable LEI (vLEI) and active engagement through events like hackathons. The partnership ecosystem includes regulatory committees and technology providers, positioning GLEIF as a central hub in entity identification infrastructure.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@gleif.org
l*****@gleif.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

GLEIF demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and ISO 20000 certification reflecting robust IT service management. The use of Google reCAPTCHA and cookie consent mechanisms indicates attention to user data protection and bot mitigation. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security.txt file and explicit incident response information suggests room for improvement in transparency and vulnerability disclosure. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced communication of security policies and incident handling procedures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)

Description:

The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) ensures the operational integrity of the Global LEI System and manages a network of LEI issuers worldwide.

Key Services:
Legal Entity Identifier issuance and managementData quality managementOpen data servicesAccreditation and qualification of LEI issuersDigital identification and verification (vLEI)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryLodashMathJaxCookiebotTwitter Universal Website TagGoogle reCAPTCHA
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management
  • ISO 20000 certification indicating IT service management standards

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Twitter InsightCookiebot Consent Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing Tools:
CookiebotTwitter tracking
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:185.171.46.141 ip4:89.202.70.76 ip4:83.135.182.163 include:spf.emailsys.net include:spf.hornetsecurity.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:gleif.org
Issuer:GlobalSign Extended Validation CA - SHA256 - G3
Valid Until:10/21/2025 (44 days)
SANs:gleif.org, louportal.gleif.org, www.gleif.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(104 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:193.17.90.130
AAAA Records:2a0c:f680:0:101::13
Name Servers:
ns1.gleif.de
ns2.gleif.de
ns3.gleif.de
ns4.gleif.de
MX Records:
40: mx04.hornetsecurity.com
20: mx02.hornetsecurity.com
10: mx01.hornetsecurity.com
30: mx03.hornetsecurity.com
SOA:Serial: 2025082750, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:210ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:185.171.46.141 ip4:89.202.70.76 ip4:83.135.182.163 include:spf.emailsys.net include:spf.hornetsecurity.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using a combination of jQuery, Lodash, and MathJax for dynamic content and mathematical rendering. Cookiebot is employed for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The presence of Twitter tracking pixels and Google reCAPTCHA indicates integration with external services for analytics and security. The site uses modern CSS and responsive design techniques, providing good mobile optimization and accessibility. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve user experience. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure online presence suitable for a global regulatory organization.
Analyze Another Website