Skip to main content

Is glempings.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Ltd “LKOM” Reviews

L

Is glempings.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Ltd “LKOM”

Check if glempings.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
Vue.jsGoogle Tag ManagerFont Awesome
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:04:10 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Glempings.eu represents a small hospitality business operating a unique glamping site named 'Klaukas' in Sigulda, Latvia. The business combines accommodation services with a kombucha microbrewery and wildlife sanctuary, targeting nature lovers and travelers seeking eco-friendly and distinctive lodging experiences. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, good mobile optimization, and relevant content that supports the business model. Booking partnerships with major platforms like Airbnb and Booking.com enhance market reach and credibility. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Vue.js and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe, with no adult or questionable content detected.

Detected Technologies

Vue.jsGoogle Tag ManagerFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the hospitality sector with a niche focus on glamping and eco-tourism. Its business model leverages unique accommodation offerings combined with a microbrewery, appealing to a specialized market segment. The presence of booking partnerships suggests a strategy to maximize occupancy and visibility. The company is small-sized, with clear contact information and legal registration details provided, enhancing credibility. Social media integration supports marketing efforts. Growth potential lies in expanding eco-tourism services and enhancing digital presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

g*****@gmail.com

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712644****
+3712644****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Ltd “LKOM”

Registration Number:

40103786427

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and a cookie consent mechanism is in place, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, which could enhance transparency and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site would benefit from implementing additional security best practices and formalizing incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ltd “LKOM”

Description:

Glamping 'Klaukas' located in Sigulda, Latvia, offering 8 furnished tents with electricity, shared kitchen, shared toilet with hot shower, and guest tent with wifi. Also operates as a kombucha microbrewery and a wildlife sanctuary.

Key Services:
Tent accommodationShared facilitiesKombucha microbrewery
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Vue.jsGoogle Tag ManagerFont Awesome
Frameworks:
Vue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism with samesite=lax

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

43/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.198
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: glempings.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025073006, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:156ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Vue.js, a modern JavaScript framework, indicating a contemporary frontend architecture. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently with preloading and modulepreload hints, suggesting attention to performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and the design is consistent and professional. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata beyond basic meta tags and Open Graph image. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but has opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Analyze Another Website