Skip to main content

Is glenmarkpharma.ca a Scam? Security Check Results - Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Reviews

glenmarkpharma.ca favicon

Is glenmarkpharma.ca Safe? Security Analysis for Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

Check if glenmarkpharma.ca is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareCanadalarge
WordPressjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsTypekit Fonts+3 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:05:50 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. operates a Canadian website providing pharmaceutical products and patient resources, focusing on generic drugs. The company is part of a global pharmaceutical group with a presence in multiple countries including the US and India. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, targeting patients and healthcare professionals in Canada. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy policies. Overall, the website reflects a credible and established pharmaceutical business with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsTypekit FontsSlick CarouselMotion UIFoundation CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a strong market position as a global pharmaceutical manufacturer with a dedicated Canadian presence. Its business model centers on manufacturing and distributing generic pharmaceutical products. The website supports patient engagement through adverse event reporting and educational content. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled communication channel, likely via contact forms. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiaries to extend its market reach. The digital presence is mature but could enhance compliance and security disclosures to align with industry best practices.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain transfer protection, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and missing security headers reduce the overall security robustness. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, which may impact trust and compliance. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but an opt-out mechanism is present. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing security and incident response policies to improve security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

Description:

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. operates in Canada providing pharmaceutical products including generic drugs. The website offers information about the company, its leadership, products, patient resources, and contact details.

Key Services:
Generic pharmaceutical productsPatient information and supportAdverse event reporting
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsTypekit FontsSlick CarouselMotion UIFoundation CSS
Frameworks:
Foundation
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
MonsterInsights
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based pharmaceutical company site for Canadian market.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "1"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(288 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.66.159
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1675782711, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of modern front-end libraries and frameworks including jQuery, Foundation CSS, and Slick Carousel. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for user tracking and performance measurement. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Typekit for custom fonts. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but domain registrar is Go Get Canada Domain Registrar Ltd. The site lacks DNSSEC and some security headers, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy technical controls.
Analyze Another Website