Skip to main content

Is globalproject.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Global Project Reviews

S

Is globalproject.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Global Project

Check if globalproject.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
TYPO3 CMS 4.5Google FontsGoogle Analytics (ga.js)Prototype.jsScriptaculous+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:57:36 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA Global Project is a Latvian small-sized company specializing in land surveying, road and street design, restoration works, construction, and real estate services. The company offers a comprehensive range of services from consultation to project realization, targeting clients across Latvia. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS version 4.5 and includes standard web technologies such as Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. While the site is accessible and professionally presented, it lacks modern security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement, which could pose risks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the company appears legitimate and focused on local market needs.

Detected Technologies

TYPO3 CMS 4.5Google FontsGoogle Analytics (ga.js)Prototype.jsScriptaculousLightbox 2.0.5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the real estate and transportation sectors, providing engineering and consulting services primarily in Latvia. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on project design, land management, and restoration. The website content and structure suggest a stable local market presence with a consistent brand image. However, the absence of privacy policies and modern security practices may affect trust and compliance. The use of an older CMS version indicates potential technical debt and security risks. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@globalproject.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712613****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate but with notable weaknesses. The website uses HTTPS for Google Analytics scripts, but no explicit SSL enforcement or security headers are detected. The CMS version is outdated, which may expose vulnerabilities. Forms have basic client-side validation but lack advanced protections like anti-CSRF tokens. No incident response or security policy information is available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the site requires improvements in security headers, HTTPS enforcement, and privacy compliance to enhance its security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS site-wide with a valid SSL certificate.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Global Project

Description:

SIA Global Project ir plaša profila uzņēmums projektēšanas, restaurācijas, būvdarbu veikšanas un nekustamo īpašumu jomā. Piedāvā pilnu pakalpojumu klāstu no konsultācijām līdz realizētām klienta vēlmēm. Sniedz zemes ierīcības projektus visā Latvijas teritorijā, restaurācijas darbus valsts nozīmes objektos, un konsultācijas nekustamo īpašumu jomā.

Key Services:
Zemes ierīcības projektu izstrādeCeļu, ielu un stāvlaukumu projektēšanaRestaurācijas darbiNekustamo īpašumu reģistrācijaBūvdarbu veikšanaKonsultācijas
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
TYPO3 CMS 4.5Google FontsGoogle Analytics (ga.js)Prototype.jsScriptaculousLightbox 2.0.5
Frameworks:
TYPO3 CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS is implied by Google Analytics script loading over https
  • Form validation via JavaScript

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.200 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:91.203.68.192/28 +ip4:85.31.97.226 +ip4:85.31.97.37 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.200
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: globalproject.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071800, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:145ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.200 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:91.203.68.192/28 +ip4:85.31.97.226 +ip4:85.31.97.37 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website runs on TYPO3 CMS 4.5, an older version that may lack recent security patches. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for styling and analytics, respectively. JavaScript libraries include Prototype.js and Scriptaculous for UI effects and Lightbox for image display. The site has a moderate performance profile with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The HTML is valid but lacks modern security and privacy enhancements. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated and requires modernization to improve security and compliance.
Analyze Another Website