Skip to main content

Is glossy.co a Scam? Security Check Results - Glossy Reviews

glossy.co favicon

Is glossy.co Safe? Security Analysis for Glossy

Check if glossy.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
WordPressYoast SEO PremiumGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook Pixel+6 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:25:17 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Glossy is a digital media company specializing in news and analysis within the beauty, fashion, and luxury sectors. It operates a subscription-based model offering exclusive content through its Glossy+ service, targeting industry professionals and enthusiasts. The website is well-branded, professionally designed, and provides a variety of content formats including articles, podcasts, and events. The parent company is Digiday Media, a recognized media entity. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and multiple analytics and marketing tools. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices with structured data and meta tags. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses several third-party security and privacy tools. However, some security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is no visible cookie consent mechanism despite the use of tracking cookies. WHOIS data is redacted, which is common for media companies but limits transparency. Overall, Glossy presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security header implementation would enhance its security posture and user trust.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO PremiumGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook PixelMicrosoft ClarityTinypass (Piano)CxenseParselyLightbox CDNSecurePrivacy plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Glossy holds a solid position in the media industry focused on fashion, beauty, and luxury markets. Its subscription model and member-exclusive content indicate diversified revenue streams beyond advertising. The company targets professionals and brands within these sectors, providing insights and trend analysis. Partnerships with Digiday Media and The Custom Agency enhance its market reach and operational capabilities. The presence of multiple social media channels and active content updates reflect a growth-oriented strategy. Glossy leverages modern digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize audience engagement and monetization.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@glossy.co

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and use of privacy plugins. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a public security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. The use of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a media website but could benefit from enhanced header policies and privacy compliance mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Glossy

Description:

Glossy provides an inside look into how brands and retailers approach new trends, technologies, channels, consumer habits and more.

Key Services:
News articlesIndustry analysisPodcastsEventsSubscription-based exclusive content (Glossy+)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO PremiumGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook PixelMicrosoft ClarityTinypass (Piano)CxenseParselyLightbox CDNSecurePrivacy plugin
Frameworks:
WordPress CMS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsParselyMicrosoft ClarityJetpack Stats
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ad Manager (DoubleClick)AdLayersDFP
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelMicrosoft ClarityParsely
Marketing Tools:
Tinypass (Piano)
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 792-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(792-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@glossy.co
Forensic Reports:dmarc@glossy.co

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(316 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.66.72
Name Servers:
ns-1463.awsdns-54.org
ns-1697.awsdns-20.co.uk
ns-293.awsdns-36.com
ns-528.awsdns-02.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Glossy is powered by WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium for search optimization. The site uses Google Tag Manager to manage multiple analytics and marketing tags including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and Parsely. Subscription and paywall functionality is handled by Tinypass (Piano). The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses a CDN for media delivery. Performance is moderate with some large images and multiple third-party scripts that could impact load times. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA roles implied. Technical debt appears low, but optimization of script loading and caching could improve speed. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website