Skip to main content

Is glue.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Glue Reviews

glue.net favicon

Is glue.net Safe? Security Analysis for Glue

Check if glue.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPress CMSTiny Slider JSGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Fonts (Roboto)+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:56:30 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Glue is a blockchain technology company focused on building an accessible, secure, and user-friendly blockchain ecosystem. Their platform includes a cross-chain Layer 1 blockchain, three interconnected Layer 2 blockchains, and the Glue Hub, a flagship product that combines the ease of centralized exchanges with the security of onchain decentralized applications. The company targets both crypto enthusiasts and mainstream users aiming to onboard the next 100 million users to blockchain technology. Their market position is that of an emerging player emphasizing security and user experience, supported by partnerships with reputable blockchain projects and a comprehensive security audit by Hashlock. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries such as Tiny Slider and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though some accessibility features are basic. The hosting and domain registration are consistent with a legitimate business, with a domain age of over 23 years. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers. There is no published privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service, which are compliance gaps. The site collects user emails via a subscription form but does not provide direct contact emails or phone numbers. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency in security matters. Overall, Glue presents a professional and trustworthy blockchain project with strong technical foundations and partnerships. However, improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPress CMSTiny Slider JSGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Fonts (Roboto)AddToAny social sharing

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Glue operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on DeFi and user-friendly blockchain infrastructure. Their business model revolves around providing blockchain services and a trading hub that mimics centralized exchange convenience with onchain security. Revenue streams likely include token sales, transaction fees, and partnerships. The company targets crypto users ranging from beginners to professionals, aiming for mass adoption. Their partnership ecosystem includes LayerZero, Avalanche, Banxa, and others, indicating strategic alliances to enhance interoperability and service offerings. The presence of a detailed roadmap and token distribution transparency suggests a well-planned growth strategy. The team includes recognized experts with strong backgrounds in cybersecurity and ad-tech, supporting credibility and operational strength.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website and associated services is moderate. The Glue blockchain has undergone a comprehensive audit by Hashlock, a leading smart contract security firm, which is a strong positive indicator. The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance and security transparency gap. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, and no security.txt file is found. The site uses tracking scripts and collects user emails via a subscription form but does not provide direct security contact channels. Overall, while the blockchain project emphasizes security, the website could improve its security posture by implementing recommended headers, policies, and disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Glue

Description:

Accessible, secure, user-friendly blockchain ecosystem for everyone. Cross-chain L1, three interconnected L2s, and the Glue Hub.

Key Services:
Glue Hub (onchain trading and investment platform)Cross-chain Layer 1 blockchainThree interconnected Layer 2 blockchainsService LayerSecurity audits and blockchain infrastructure
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress CMSTiny Slider JSGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Fonts (Roboto)AddToAny social sharing
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • Security audit referenced publicly

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Microsoft ClarityGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
ActiveCampaign (email subscription form)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

35/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(566 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.21, 141.193.213.20
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:114ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern front-end libraries such as Tiny Slider for carousels and uses Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses AddToAny for social sharing. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but the domain registrar is NameCheap, Inc. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to improve performance. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided data. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Analyze Another Website