Skip to main content

Is glyph.exchange a Scam? Security Check Results - glyph.exchange Reviews

glyph.exchange favicon

Is glyph.exchange Safe? Security Analysis for Glyph Exchange | Bitcoin-powered DEX on Core DAO

Check if glyph.exchange is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsAnt DesignGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare Pages
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:55:24 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Glyph Exchange operates as a decentralized exchange (DEX) platform on the Bitcoin-powered Core DAO network, enabling users to trade BRC-20 tokens with ERC-20 tokens and other inscription assets. Positioned as the flagship DEX on this network, it offers a suite of DeFi features targeting cryptocurrency traders and DeFi enthusiasts. The website content is focused and relevant to its niche, though it lacks detailed business and contact information on the main page. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including React, Next.js, and Ant Design, hosted on Cloudflare Pages, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. Google Analytics is used for tracking, but privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating gaps in privacy compliance. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers, which could be improved to enhance security posture. Security-wise, the platform shows a moderate maturity level with no obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits its security transparency. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to unsupported TLD or privacy protection, which is common in crypto projects but reduces trust signals. Overall, Glyph Exchange presents a professional and functional platform with room for improvement in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, providing clear contact and incident response information, and publishing vulnerability disclosure details to enhance trust and security posture.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsAnt DesignGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare Pages

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Glyph Exchange targets the decentralized finance market within the Bitcoin ecosystem, leveraging the Core DAO network to bridge liquidity between BRC-20 and ERC-20 tokens. Its business model centers on providing a decentralized trading platform with advanced DeFi features, appealing to crypto traders and developers interested in Bitcoin-based DeFi solutions. The platform's market position as a flagship DEX on Core DAO suggests a niche but potentially growing user base. Revenue streams likely include trading fees and liquidity incentives. The absence of detailed company information and contact data limits visibility into partnerships and growth indicators. The use of modern web infrastructure and analytics tools indicates a digitally mature operation, though privacy compliance gaps may pose regulatory risks.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of Glyph Exchange is moderate. The site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration, which is fundamental for secure communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or user input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface on the front end. The absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contacts indicates compliance and operational gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were detected, the platform would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation to strengthen trust and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Glyph Exchange is the Flagship DEX on Bitcoin-powered Core DAO network. The protocol drives EVM liquidity to the Bitcoin ecosystem. Trade BRC-20s with ERC-20s and any inscription assets with a comprehensive suite of DeFi features.

Key Services:
Decentralized token exchangeTrading BRC-20 tokens with ERC-20 tokensDeFi features for inscription assets
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsAnt DesignGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare Pages
Frameworks:
Next.jsAnt Design
Platforms:
Cloudflare Pages
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a decentralized exchange platform focused on Bitcoin-powered Core DAO network.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, DENY"

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.glyph.exchange ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:041ebad0db554cc7921c5dd0170cf12d@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:glyph.exchange
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/24/2025 (78 days)
SANs:glyph.exchange

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:188.114.96.1, 188.114.97.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3033::6815:5fb3, 2606:4700:3036::ac43:aaf6
Name Servers:
pete.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
zara.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381435453, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:138ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.glyph.exchange ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework with Ant Design UI components, hosted on Cloudflare Pages, ensuring fast load times and good mobile responsiveness. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. No CMS or backend platform was detected, suggesting a static or serverless architecture. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced with better security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Analyze Another Website