Is gmx.io Safe? Security Analysis for GMX
Check if gmx.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
GMX is a decentralized perpetual exchange platform enabling leveraged trading of major cryptocurrencies such as BTC, ETH, and AVAX on the Arbitrum and Avalanche blockchains. The platform targets cryptocurrency traders seeking decentralized finance solutions with up to 100x leverage and liquidity provision opportunities. GMX has established a significant market presence with over $322 billion in total trading volume and a user base exceeding 720,000. The business model revolves around decentralized trading, liquidity provision, and governance via utility tokens GMX, GLV, and GM. Technically, the website employs a modern React-based frontend with Web3 integration, hosted on NS1 DNS infrastructure, and optimized for performance and mobile use. However, the site lacks some compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies, and security headers are not detected, which could be improved to enhance security posture and regulatory compliance. Overall, GMX demonstrates a mature and professional digital presence with strong trust indicators but should address privacy and security policy gaps to strengthen its risk profile.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
GMX operates in the competitive decentralized finance sector, focusing on perpetual futures trading with high leverage. Its competitive advantages include multi-chain deployment (Arbitrum and Avalanche), a large and active user base, and a governance model that empowers token holders. Revenue streams derive from trading fees distributed to token holders and liquidity providers. The platform appeals primarily to experienced crypto traders and DeFi participants. GMX maintains an active ecosystem with governance, voting, and open-source protocol development on GitHub. Strategic observations include the need to enhance compliance transparency and security best practices to maintain trust and regulatory alignment as the DeFi space evolves.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of GMX is moderate to good. The platform uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in formal security governance and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. To improve, GMX should implement DNSSEC, add security headers, publish privacy and security policies, and establish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
GMX
Trade spot or perpetual BTC, ETH, AVAX and other top cryptocurrencies with up to 100x leverage directly from your wallet on Arbitrum and Avalanche.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Client transfer prohibited domain status
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a decentralized perpetual exchange platform with a strong focus on crypto trading.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Twitter
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 86 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings