Skip to main content

Is gnosisfaucet.com a Scam? Security Check Results - gnosisfaucet.com Reviews

gnosisfaucet.com favicon

Is gnosisfaucet.com Safe? Security Analysis for gnosisfaucet.com

Check if gnosisfaucet.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis Syndicated Search
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:17:38 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website gnosisfaucet.com appears to be a parked or placeholder domain with minimal content and no substantive business information. It primarily serves ads via Google Adsense and Bodis syndicated search, indicating monetization of domain traffic rather than an active business. The lack of WHOIS data and registrant information further suggests the domain is either unregistered, privacy protected, or not actively managed by a legitimate entity. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. Security posture is weak with no security headers or privacy compliance mechanisms implemented. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile with minimal business credibility and poor content quality.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis Syndicated Search

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

There is no identifiable business entity or operational model behind the domain. The site does not provide contact information, company details, or services. Its market positioning is non-existent, likely serving as a domain parking page monetized through advertising networks. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The target audience is general web users who may land on the domain by chance. There are no growth indicators or strategic business insights available.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal. The site uses HTTPS but lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS. No forms or user inputs reduce attack surface but also limit functionality. There is no evidence of incident response policies, vulnerability disclosures, or data protection officers. Privacy compliance is poor with no cookie consent or GDPR indicators. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant transparency raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish clear WHOIS registration data to improve transparency and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a parked domain or placeholder page with no substantive business description or services offered.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis Syndicated Search
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseBodis
Tracking Pixels:
Google Adsense
Marketing Tools:
Bodis Syndicated Search
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain or placeholder with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fdcf:abda:4154::/48 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:103.224.182.214
Name Servers:
ns1.abovedomains.comDNS only
ns2.abovedomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: park-mx.above.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090701, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:263ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fdcf:abda:4154::/48 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and relies on third-party ad networks for monetization. There is no CMS or advanced framework detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization or accessibility features. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks SEO optimization beyond minimal meta tags. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible. The technical implementation is minimal and suitable only for a parked domain or placeholder site.
Analyze Another Website