Skip to main content

Is gnosispay.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Gnosis Pay Reviews

gnosispay.com favicon

Is gnosispay.com Safe? Security Analysis for Gnosis Pay

Check if gnosispay.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerPostHog analyticsFramer
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:14:19 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Gnosis Pay is a recently founded company (2023) operating in the decentralized finance (DeFi) payments sector, aiming to bridge traditional finance (TradFi) and DeFi through a decentralized payments network. The website presents a basic but consistent branding and design, targeting users and businesses interested in fintech and blockchain payment solutions. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including Framer for CMS, Google Tag Manager, and PostHog for analytics, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide contact information, which impacts its compliance and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with no detected WAF or blocking mechanisms, but missing security headers and DNSSEC are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerPostHog analyticsFramer

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gnosis Pay positions itself as a fintech innovator in the payments space, focusing on interoperability between traditional and decentralized finance systems. The business model revolves around providing a decentralized payments network, likely monetizing through transaction fees or partnerships. The target market includes fintech companies, blockchain users, and enterprises seeking DeFi integration. The company is small-sized and newly established, with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The website content is basic, indicating an early-stage digital presence. No explicit trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials are present, suggesting room for growth in market credibility and partnership ecosystem development.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms further impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires significant improvements in policy publication, header implementation, and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Gnosis Pay

Description:

Gnosis Pay is a decentralized payments network that removes the barriers between TradFi and DeFi.

Key Services:
Decentralized payments networkBridging TradFi and DeFi payments
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerPostHog analyticsFramer
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerPostHog
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PostHog
Marketing Tools:
PostHog
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:security@gnosispay.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(205 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:35.71.142.77, 52.223.52.2
Name Servers:
ns-1332.awsdns-38.org
ns-1913.awsdns-47.co.uk
ns-356.awsdns-44.com
ns-778.awsdns-33.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:126ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and PostHog. Hosting appears to be via Amazon Registrar's DNS services, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO with proper meta tags and responsive design. However, no advanced accessibility features or performance optimizations beyond basic levels are evident. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. The site lacks structured data beyond Open Graph metadata, limiting rich search engine results. Overall, the technical infrastructure is sound but can benefit from enhanced security configurations and richer SEO and accessibility implementations.
Analyze Another Website