Skip to main content

Is goldbeck.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Goldbeck sia Reviews

goldbeck.lv favicon

Is goldbeck.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Goldbeck sia

Check if goldbeck.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginjQuery 3.7.1Crelly Slider pluginFinal Tiles Grid Gallery plugin+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:31:41 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Goldbeck sia is a small Latvian company operating in the hospitality and real estate sectors, focusing on tourism services such as guest house accommodation and property sales near Alūksnes lake. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins for SEO, cookie consent, and image galleries, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is multilingual, supporting Latvian, English, and German languages, targeting regional tourists and property buyers. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which slightly reduces trustworthiness but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is professional and compliant with GDPR requirements, though improvements in transparency and security practices are recommended.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginjQuery 3.7.1Crelly Slider pluginFinal Tiles Grid Gallery pluginCookie Notice pluginGoogle Site Kit

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Goldbeck sia positions itself as a local hospitality and real estate provider with a focus on tourism and property management. The business model combines service offerings (guest house accommodation) with real estate sales, targeting tourists and property investors in Latvia. The website content is consistent and professionally presented, supporting the company's market position. The use of Google Analytics and cookie consent indicates awareness of digital marketing and privacy compliance. However, the absence of direct contact information and detailed business credentials limits transparency. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked from the site. The company appears to maintain a modest online presence suitable for a small business in its sector.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting basic security and privacy compliance. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields were found, reducing the attack surface. The site uses up-to-date WordPress core and plugins, but no explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. WHOIS data is not accessible, which limits domain trust analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and improving transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Goldbeck sia

Description:

Goldbeck sia operates in tourism and property management, offering guest house accommodation and real estate properties for sale near Alūksnes lake.

Key Services:
Guest house accommodation (Viesu nams “Ceļinieks”)Real estate sales near Alūksnes lake
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginjQuery 3.7.1Crelly Slider pluginFinal Tiles Grid Gallery pluginCookie Notice pluginGoogle Site Kit
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google Site Kit
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress site with standard plugins for SEO, cookie consent, and galleries.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

43/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.65.130
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:184ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with plugins such as Yoast SEO, Crelly Slider, Final Tiles Grid Gallery, and Cookie Notice, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. Google Site Kit and Google Analytics are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive navigation and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate with optimized images and standard scripts. No advanced frameworks beyond WordPress core and plugins are detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses modern web standards and SEO best practices but lacks advanced security headers and detailed technical documentation.
Analyze Another Website