Skip to main content

Is goldfields.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Gold Fields Reviews

goldfields.com favicon

Is goldfields.com Safe? Security Analysis for Gold Fields

Check if goldfields.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyN/alarge
jQuery 3.6.0Bootstrap CSSGoogle Tag ManagerMeta Pixel (Facebook Pixel)Cookiebot Consent Management
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:05:59 PM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Gold Fields is a large, global gold mining company with operations in multiple countries. The website presents a professional corporate image with a focus on gold mining and sustainability. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with tracking and marketing tools integrated with user consent. However, the absence of WHOIS data and registrant information is unusual and warrants further investigation. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Overall, the website is credible and professional but could improve transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.6.0Bootstrap CSSGoogle Tag ManagerMeta Pixel (Facebook Pixel)Cookiebot Consent Management

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gold Fields operates in the energy sector focusing on gold mining. The company targets investors, stakeholders, and industry professionals. The business model revolves around sustainable mining and resource extraction. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a large enterprise market position. The company uses multiple analytics and marketing tools to engage and track visitors, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. No direct contact or detailed corporate registration information is found on the site, which is a minor gap in business transparency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

g*****@tip-offs.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR principles. It integrates Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, and Meta Pixel for tracking with user consent. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no published security or incident response policies were found. The lack of WHOIS data reduces trust in domain registration transparency. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. The security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adding security headers, publishing security policies, and providing incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Gold Fields

Description:

Gold Fields is a global gold mining company with operations in multiple countries including Australia, South Africa, Peru, Ghana, Chile, and Canada. The company focuses on gold mining and related activities.

Key Services:
Gold miningSustainable mining operationsInvestor relationsCorporate social responsibility
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.6.0Bootstrap CSSGoogle Tag ManagerMeta Pixel (Facebook Pixel)Cookiebot Consent Management
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel with consent

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsAdobe Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking Pixels:
Meta Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with good mobile responsiveness.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

90/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin, strict-origin-when-cross-origin"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=9tz4cql7._spf._d.mim.ec
DNS Lookups:0/10
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:576ea4547ce4762@rep.dmarcanalyzer.com
Forensic Reports:576ea4547ce4762@for.dmarcanalyzer.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(174 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:41.149.73.18
Name Servers:
ns1.iptwins.net
ns2.iptwins.net
ns3.iptwins.com
ns4.iptwins.com
MX Records:
10: za-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.co.za
10: za-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.co.za
SOA:Serial: 2025100301, TTL: 345600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:87ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=9tz4cql7._spf._d.mim.ec

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap CSS, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate based on included scripts and CSS. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional corporate website with opportunities for enhanced security and transparency.
Analyze Another Website