Skip to main content

Is goo.gl a Scam? Security Check Results - Google LLC Reviews

goo.gl favicon

Is goo.gl Safe? Security Analysis for Google LLC

Check if goo.gl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesenterprise
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerYouTube Player API+2 more
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 11:29:07 AM
75
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Google Developers Blog page analyzed is an official communication channel from Google LLC, providing detailed information about the discontinuation of the Google URL Shortener service. The content is targeted primarily at developers and technical professionals who use Google's developer tools and services. The site is part of Google's extensive ecosystem, reflecting a mature and well-established technology company with a strong market position and a comprehensive suite of developer products and cloud services. The blog post is well-structured, professionally designed, and offers multilingual support, enhancing accessibility and user experience. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, and Google Fonts, hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security headers are not fully confirmed in the provided data. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear links to Google's comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, indicating adherence to GDPR and other regulations. From a security perspective, the site shows no signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, there is an opportunity to enhance transparency by publishing dedicated security policies and incident response contacts. The domain is a subdomain of googleblog.com, owned by Google LLC, with no WHOIS data available for the subdomain, which is typical and expected. This supports a high legitimacy score and trustworthiness. Overall, the website represents a secure, professional, and trustworthy platform for disseminating important developer-related announcements. Strategic recommendations include confirming security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and providing clearer incident response channels to further strengthen security posture and user trust.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerYouTube Player APIGoogle FontsJSON-LD structured data

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Google LLC operates as a global technology leader with a dominant market position in developer tools, cloud computing, and internet services. The Google Developers Blog serves as a key communication channel to engage developers worldwide, providing updates, best practices, and technical guidance. The business model is based on offering free and paid developer services, APIs, and cloud infrastructure, generating revenue through cloud services and advertising. The target audience includes software developers, engineers, and technical decision-makers. The company benefits from a vast partnership ecosystem and a strong brand reputation. Growth indicators include continuous innovation in AI, cloud, and mobile platforms. The blog content reflects strategic focus on transitioning legacy services like the URL Shortener to newer platforms such as Firebase Dynamic Links, indicating ongoing modernization efforts.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options were not confirmed in the provided data, representing a potential area for improvement. The absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency for security researchers and users. Incident response contact information is not publicly available on the page, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is high given Google's reputation and infrastructure, but formalizing and publishing security policies would enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Confirm and explicitly implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Google LLC

Description:

Google Developers Blog provides news and updates about Google's developer products and services including Web, Mobile, AI, and Cloud technologies.

Key Services:
Google URL ShortenerFirebaseGoogle CloudAndroid developmentGoogle APIs
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerYouTube Player APIGoogle FontsJSON-LD structured data
Platforms:
Google Cloud Hosting
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (implied via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official Google Developers Blog page

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000; includeSubdomains"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:mailauth-reports@google.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:misc-sni.google.com
Issuer:WR2
Valid Until:11/10/2025 (66 days)
SANs:misc-sni.google.com, *.aiplatform-notebook.cloud.google.com, *.aiplatform-training.cloud.google.com +323 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:216.58.210.161
AAAA Records:2a00:1450:4026:805::2001
Name Servers:
ns1.google.comDNS only
ns2.google.comDNS only
ns3.google.comDNS only
ns4.google.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 802497988, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:30ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Google Tag Manager and YouTube Player API for analytics and media embedding. It uses Google Fonts for typography and is hosted on Google Cloud Platform, ensuring high availability and performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well-implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The technical infrastructure is robust, scalable, and aligned with best practices for developer-focused content delivery.
Analyze Another Website