Skip to main content

Is google520.net a Scam? Security Check Results - 向前网络-包头外贸网站建设 Reviews

Is google520.net Safe? Security Analysis for 向前网络-包头外贸网站建设

Check if google520.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinasmall
jQueryBootstrapResponsiveSlidesWOW.js
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 10:26:30 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

向前网络是一家专注于外贸网站建设和Google SEO优化的中国公司,主要服务中小企业和个人用户。公司拥有10年行业经验,提供包括外贸网站建设、推广、Google Ads付费广告、微信SEO关键词排名等多项服务。其市场定位为国内领先的外贸建站和Google SEO源头厂家,拥有丰富的客户案例和较高的客户续费率。技术基础采用WordPress CMS,结合jQuery和Bootstrap等现代前端技术,网站设计注重响应式和用户体验。安全方面,网站未启用DNSSEC,缺少安全头部和隐私政策,存在一定的合规和安全改进空间。整体网站内容专业,导航清晰,适合目标客户群体。建议加强安全配置和隐私合规以提升整体信任度和安全性。

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapResponsiveSlidesWOW.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

公司通过提供定制化的外贸网站建设和SEO推广服务,满足中国中小企业出海需求,利用Google SEO和付费广告提升客户流量和转化。其业务模式以项目交付和后续推广服务为主,强调源码交付和客户满意度。合作伙伴和外链资源丰富,覆盖多个相关行业和技术领域。公司定位明确,价格合理,注重客户长期合作和续费率。市场竞争力体现在专业技术团队和丰富案例积累。未来发展可通过完善安全合规和扩大服务范围进一步提升市场份额。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

3*****@qq.com

Phone Numbers (1)

147*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

当前网站安全成熟度中等,未检测到HTTPS强制或安全头部,DNSSEC未启用,存在潜在DNS安全风险。无公开的安全政策或事件响应流程,缺乏漏洞披露渠道。网站未发现明显敏感信息泄露或已知漏洞,但安全最佳实践未完全落实。建议实施HTTPS强制、添加安全头部、启用DNSSEC,并公开隐私政策和安全联系方式以提升安全文化和合规性。整体安全风险中等,需关注合规和技术加固。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用HTTPS强制和HSTS头部,确保所有访问安全加密。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

向前网络-包头外贸网站建设

Description:

包头向前网络外贸网站建设,是专业外贸网站定制设计公司,我们在WordPress开发定制网站建设领域深耕10年,擅长于WordPress外贸网站建设推广等服务,让您通过海外网站建设将独立站品牌销往全球!

Key Services:
外贸网站建设外贸网站推广Google Ads付费广告微信SEO关键词排名微信小程序制作抖音关键词搜索排名
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapResponsiveSlidesWOW.js
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • No DNSSEC enabled
  • Domain status OK

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese targeting external trade website building and SEO services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

12 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(146 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:223.254.131.198
Name Servers:
jeff.dnspod.net
ship.dnspod.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于WordPress CMS,使用Bootstrap框架和jQuery等前端库,技术栈现代且成熟。页面设计响应式,适配移动设备,用户体验良好。性能表现中等,未见明显加载瓶颈。缺少安全头部和HTTPS强制,存在技术改进空间。无复杂后台技术或云服务信息,托管于DNSPod注册域名。整体技术架构适合中小企业外贸网站需求,但需加强安全和合规技术措施。
Analyze Another Website