Skip to main content

Is googleoptimize.com a Scam? Security Check Results - googleoptimize.com Reviews

G

Is googleoptimize.com Safe? Security Analysis for Error 404 (Not Found)!!1

Check if googleoptimize.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 11:27:50 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain googleoptimize.com is registered to MarkMonitor Inc. with Google name servers, indicating it is a legitimate Google-owned domain. However, the website content at the root URL is a standard 404 error page with no active content, no privacy or cookie policies, no contact information, and no business details. The lack of content suggests the domain is either reserved or not currently hosting a public-facing website. The technical infrastructure appears consistent with Google standards, but no active technologies or scripts are present on the page. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the absence of content and headers. Overall, the site is non-functional and provides no user or business value at this URL.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

There is no business content or description available on the website. The domain is likely intended for Google Optimize services or related purposes but currently does not provide any public-facing information or services. The domain age and registrar details align with a corporate asset rather than a commercial or public website. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or business operations are evident from the content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to the lack of content and security headers. No HTTPS or SSL configuration details were provided. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures are present. The domain registration details are trustworthy, but the website itself offers no security or privacy assurances to visitors.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Deploy a functional website or redirect to an active service to avoid user confusion and improve trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

The website content is a minimal 404 error page indicating no active content at the root URL.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:mailauth-reports@google.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.google-analytics.com
Issuer:WR2
Valid Until:11/10/2025 (66 days)
SANs:*.google-analytics.com, region1.app-measurement.com, app-measurement.com +21 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(212 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:216.58.211.238
AAAA Records:2a00:1450:4026:808::200e
Name Servers:
ns1.google.com
ns2.google.com
ns3.google.com
ns4.google.com
SOA:Serial: 802497988, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:36ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a minimal HTML 404 error page with no scripts, forms, or metadata beyond basic viewport and charset tags. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The domain uses Google name servers, indicating hosting within Google's infrastructure. Performance and SEO optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. Mobile optimization is basic as the page is minimal but responsive. Accessibility is minimal but acceptable for a simple error page. There is no evidence of technical debt or vulnerabilities from the provided data, but the lack of content limits the technical maturity assessment.
Analyze Another Website