Skip to main content

Is gostanford.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Stanford Cardinal Reviews

gostanford.com favicon

Is gostanford.com Safe? Security Analysis for Stanford Cardinal

Check if gostanford.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Stateslarge
Tailwind CSSGoogle FontsSwiper.js
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:57:03 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website gostanford.com serves as the official athletics platform for Stanford Cardinal, representing Stanford University's sports teams. It provides comprehensive sports news, schedules, athlete profiles, and event information targeted primarily at sports fans, the university community, and media. The domain is well-established, created in 1997, and aligns with the branding and business model of a university athletics site. Technically, the site employs modern front-end technologies such as Tailwind CSS and Google Fonts, ensuring a responsive and visually appealing user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed through reputable providers, including GoDaddy as registrar and Google Domains for DNS. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization, though accessibility and SEO could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected, indicating room for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, which is a significant gap given GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and privacy compliance measures to strengthen its posture and user trust.

Detected Technologies

Tailwind CSSGoogle FontsSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Stanford Cardinal operates within the education sector, specifically university athletics. Its market position is authoritative as the official source for Stanford sports content. The business model focuses on information dissemination and community engagement rather than direct revenue generation. Key services include sports news, schedules, and merchandise promotion. The target audience includes students, alumni, sports fans, and media. The domain's longevity and consistent branding reinforce its credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information suggests limited transparency in security incident handling. Privacy compliance is insufficient, lacking GDPR indicators and cookie consent mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Stanford Cardinal

Description:

Official athletics website for Stanford Cardinal, providing news, schedules, and information related to Stanford University sports teams.

Key Services:
Sports newsSchedulesAthlete profilesEvent informationMerchandise
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Tailwind CSSGoogle FontsSwiper.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is official Stanford Cardinal athletics site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=28800"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

7/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

35/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(692 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.144.235.6
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-e1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-e2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-e3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-e4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
0: sitemail.everyone.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:42ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern CSS framework (Tailwind CSS) and Google Fonts for typography, indicating a contemporary front-end design approach. Swiper.js is used for interactive sliders. The site is hosted with DNS managed by Google Domains and registered via GoDaddy, both reputable providers. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. However, the absence of detected analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user data collection. The lack of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. No CMS or backend technologies were identified from the provided HTML snippet.
Analyze Another Website