Skip to main content

Is govqa.us a Scam? Security Check Results - Granicus, LLC Reviews

G

Is govqa.us Safe? Security Analysis for Granicus, LLC

Check if govqa.us is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Statesmedium
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:52:41 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain govqa.us is registered to Granicus, LLC, a US-based company established in 2016. The website currently serves a 404 error page indicating that the requested content is missing or unavailable. There is no accessible content, metadata, or structured data to analyze, and no contact or policy information is present on the page. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, but the website itself is non-functional at this time. From a technical perspective, the site appears to be hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure based on DNS nameservers, but no CMS, frameworks, or scripts are detectable due to the minimal content. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available, and no privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating a lack of compliance and security best practices. Security posture is weak due to the absence of accessible content, lack of HTTPS confirmation, and missing security policies. There are no indications of WAF or security blocking mechanisms. Overall, the site is not currently serving its intended purpose and presents a poor user experience with no trust or credibility signals. The overall risk is low from a content safety perspective as the page is a standard error message with no adult or explicit content. However, the lack of content and security measures suggests the site is either under maintenance or abandoned, which could pose risks if sensitive services are expected to be hosted here.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Granicus, LLC is the registrant and likely the operator behind govqa.us. Granicus is known for providing government technology solutions, which aligns with the domain's government sector classification. The domain age and registration details are consistent with a medium-sized business operating in the US government technology sector. However, the lack of website content and contact information limits insight into current business operations or market positioning. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked via the domain. The absence of marketing or analytics tools suggests minimal digital engagement at this URL.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently lacks visible security best practices such as HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or privacy policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The domain registration is secure with clientTransferProhibited status, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. The absence of accessible content and forms reduces immediate attack surface but also indicates poor operational security posture. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations cannot be confirmed due to missing policies. Overall, the security maturity is low and requires significant improvements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a fully functional website with proper content and navigation to improve user experience and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Granicus, LLC

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website currently returns a 404 error page indicating the requested resource is missing or unavailable.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=300"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

90/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:62.11.114.215 ip4:52.227.180.114 ip4:208.78.169.130 include:sendgrid.net ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+trghkrrdxob@dmarc.postmarkapp.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(92 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.245.212.204
Name Servers:
ns-1447.awsdns-52.org
ns-1677.awsdns-17.co.uk
ns-328.awsdns-41.com
ns-965.awsdns-56.net
MX Records:
20: govqa-us.relay1h.spamh.com
10: govqa-us.relay1g.spamh.com
30: govqa-us.relay1i.spamh.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:62.11.114.215 ip4:52.227.180.114 ip4:208.78.169.130 include:sendgrid.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is currently non-functional, serving only a 404 error page with minimal HTML content. No CMS, frameworks, or scripts are detected. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS based on DNS nameservers. There is no evidence of modern web technologies or performance optimization. The lack of metadata and SEO elements indicates poor technical implementation. Accessibility and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to missing content. The technical debt is high, and modernization is needed to support business operations effectively.
Analyze Another Website