Skip to main content

Is gpracing.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Motorsport Network Media UK Reviews

gpracing.com favicon

Is gpracing.com Safe? Security Analysis for Motorsport Network Media UK

Check if gpracing.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Kingdommedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelNew Relic Browser MonitoringjQuery (implied by vendor.js)+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:58:01 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

GP Racing is a well-established Formula 1 magazine brand offering print and digital subscriptions, positioned as the world’s best-selling F1 magazine. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain registration transparency, although the affiliation with Motorsport Network supports legitimacy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response contacts. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, supporting user trust. Overall, the site presents a professional media business with room for improvement in security transparency and direct contact availability.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelNew Relic Browser MonitoringjQuery (implied by vendor.js)Slick Carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GP Racing operates in the media sector, targeting motorsport and Formula 1 enthusiasts globally. Its business model centers on subscription sales for print and digital editions, supplemented by premium content access. The brand benefits from association with Motorsport Network, enhancing market position and trust. The website’s external partnerships with autosportmedia.com and autosport.com indicate a robust ecosystem for content distribution and subscription management. Growth potential lies in expanding digital offerings and enhancing user engagement through community features. The lack of direct contact details on the site may limit customer support effectiveness.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and integrates reputable analytics and marketing services, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response contact information is provided, which is a gap in transparency and user trust. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing incident response contacts would improve security posture and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Motorsport Network Media UK

Description:

GP Racing is a Formula 1 magazine offering print and digital editions, featuring incisive writing, award-winning photography, and innovative design focused on Formula 1 and motorsport.

Key Services:
Print magazine subscriptionDigital magazine subscriptionAccess to premium motorsport content
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelNew Relic Browser MonitoringjQuery (implied by vendor.js)Slick Carousel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsNew Relic Browser MonitoringFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and subscription options.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(279 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.254.21.159, 52.51.196.170
Name Servers:
ns-106.awsdns-13.com
ns-1222.awsdns-24.org
ns-1762.awsdns-28.co.uk
ns-989.awsdns-59.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:160ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and New Relic for performance monitoring. It employs responsive design techniques and optimized images for various screen sizes. The site loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and structured content. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring.
Analyze Another Website