Skip to main content

Is gq.com a Scam? Security Check Results - GQ Reviews

gq.com favicon

Is gq.com Safe? Security Analysis for GQ

Check if gq.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
JavaScriptWeb fonts (woff2, woff, eot)JSON-LD structured dataGoogle Publisher TagsFides consent management
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:01:55 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

GQ is a prominent men's fashion and lifestyle media brand owned by Condé Nast, offering a wide range of content including style, grooming, fitness, entertainment, lifestyle, news, and politics. The website serves a mature male audience interested in contemporary fashion and culture. The digital infrastructure employs modern web technologies, including JavaScript frameworks, web fonts, and structured data for SEO. Consent management is implemented via Fides, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and consent mechanisms, but lacks visible advanced security headers. The WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for large media brands. Overall, the site is professionally designed, content-rich, and trustworthy, with standard advertising and tracking technologies integrated.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptWeb fonts (woff2, woff, eot)JSON-LD structured dataGoogle Publisher TagsFides consent management

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GQ holds a strong market position as a leading men's fashion and lifestyle publication under the Condé Nast umbrella. Its business model revolves around digital media publishing and advertising revenue. The brand targets men interested in fashion, fitness, and culture, leveraging a broad content portfolio and sister brands for cross-promotion. The presence of multiple partner domains from Condé Nast indicates a robust partnership ecosystem. The site demonstrates high content quality and branding consistency, supporting its credibility and market reach.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@newyorker.com

Phone Numbers (1)

180*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and consent management for privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses third-party advertising and analytics scripts, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed, which is typical for media sites but could be enhanced for transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

GQ

Description:

The latest tips and advice for men on style, grooming, fitness, best products, travel destinations and more. Find politics, sports and entertainment news.

Key Services:
online magazine contentfashion and lifestyle advicenews coverageadvertising platform
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptWeb fonts (woff2, woff, eot)JSON-LD structured dataGoogle Publisher TagsFides consent management
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • Consent management via Fides

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
ParselyGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
ParselyFides Consent Management
Marketing Tools:
Martech by Condé Nast
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional media publication for men's fashion and lifestyle.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

87/100
Score

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.gq.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1408-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:gq.com
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Valid Until:3/13/2026 (189 days)
SANs:gq.com, *.gq.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.0.239, 151.101.64.239, 151.101.192.239, 151.101.128.239
Name Servers:
ns-1116.awsdns-11.orgDNS only
ns-1935.awsdns-49.co.ukDNS only
ns-28.awsdns-03.comDNS only
ns-836.awsdns-40.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.gq.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript, web fonts, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Consent management is handled by Fides, integrated with Condé Nast's martech platform. Advertising is served via Google DoubleClick and other Condé Nast ad services. Performance is moderate with preloading of images and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive images and viewport settings. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS was explicitly detected, but likely a proprietary or custom solution given the brand scale. Hosting provider details are not visible. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional media publishing platform with standard digital marketing integrations.
Analyze Another Website