Skip to main content

Is grafikawebsrnka.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Ing. Kateřina Srncová Reviews

grafikawebsrnka.cz favicon

Is grafikawebsrnka.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Ing. Kateřina Srncová

Check if grafikawebsrnka.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
WordPressBootstrapFont AwesomeFree UnderConstructionPage plugin
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:33:53 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.grafikawebsrnka.cz represents a small business or individual service provider specializing in graphic design and web development services, including corporate logos, business cards, flyers, and websites. However, the site is currently under construction and contains only a placeholder page with minimal content. The business appears to be operated by Ing. Kateřina Srncová, but no further company details or contact information are provided. The market position and business scale cannot be determined from the available data. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using a free under construction plugin, Bootstrap for styling, and Font Awesome for icons. The site shows basic mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata but lacks advanced technical features or performance optimizations. No hosting provider or infrastructure details are discernible. Security measures are minimal, with no security headers detected and no visible HTTPS verification from the data provided. From a security perspective, the absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, suggesting the domain may be unregistered, recently registered, or privacy-protected with no public data. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is available. The site does not use analytics or tracking technologies, which limits data privacy concerns but also reduces business intelligence capabilities. Overall, the security posture is weak, with recommendations to implement HTTPS, security headers, and proper policies. The overall risk assessment is moderate to high due to the lack of transparency, minimal content, and missing registration data. Strategic recommendations include completing the website content, publishing privacy and cookie policies, securing the domain registration, and enhancing security configurations to build trust and comply with regulations.

Detected Technologies

WordPressBootstrapFont AwesomeFree UnderConstructionPage plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business appears to be a small-scale graphic and web design service provider targeting local or small business clients in the Czech Republic. The business model is service-based, focusing on creative design and website creation. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. Revenue streams likely come from client projects. The lack of contact information and business policies limits customer engagement and trust. Growth indicators and competitive positioning cannot be assessed due to minimal online presence. The company should focus on establishing a professional web presence and clear communication channels to improve market positioning.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is low. The website lacks essential security headers and does not demonstrate HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or data protection officers are identified. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. The site does not collect user data or use analytics, reducing exposure but also limiting business insights. Immediate improvements should focus on securing the domain, enabling HTTPS, publishing privacy policies, and implementing security best practices to reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Secure the domain registration and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or justified by privacy protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ing. Kateřina Srncová

Description:

Tvoříme firemní loga, vizitky, letáky a webové stránky

Key Services:
firemní logavizitkyletákywebové stránky
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressBootstrapFont AwesomeFree UnderConstructionPage plugin
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently under construction with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.forpsi.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)

DNS Records

A Records:185.129.138.87
Name Servers:
ns.forpsi.czDNS only
ns.forpsi.it
ns.forpsi.net
MX Records:
10: mxavas.forpsi.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071001, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:128ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.forpsi.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with a free under construction plugin, Bootstrap CSS framework, and Font Awesome icons. The HTML structure is basic but valid, with meta tags for viewport and description. External resources are loaded from fonts.bunny.net and the site domain itself. No analytics or tracking scripts are present. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and use of caching plugins. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Accessibility features are minimal. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and security configurations. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the data.
Analyze Another Website