Skip to main content

Is grafique.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Webdesign Studio GRAFIQUE Reviews

grafique.cz favicon

Is grafique.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Webdesign Studio GRAFIQUE

Check if grafique.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyCzech Republicsmall
WordPressGravity FormsGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+3 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 11:23:35 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Webdesign Studio GRAFIQUE is a small, established creative agency based in Brno, Czech Republic, specializing in web design, graphic design, SEO, online marketing, and photography services. The company has a strong local presence with over 20 years of experience and a portfolio of more than 250 projects. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses seeking comprehensive digital and print design solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Gravity Forms, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA, ensuring a functional and user-friendly experience. Security measures include HTTPS and consent management, though additional security headers and policies could enhance their posture. Overall, the website is well-optimized for SEO and accessibility, with clear contact channels and GDPR compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGravity FormsGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsjQueryTyped.jsFoundation framework

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the technology and media sectors, focusing on creative services for business clients primarily in the Czech Republic. Their business model revolves around project-based service delivery with ongoing marketing support. The presence of notable clients and a detailed portfolio suggests a competitive position in the local market. The use of multilingual support and social media integration indicates a strategy to broaden reach. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits external verification of domain legitimacy. The company does not publicly disclose security policies or incident response plans, which could be areas for future improvement to build trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@grafique.cz

Phone Numbers (1)

+4206046*****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting the contact form. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense in depth. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the site is secure for typical business use but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Webdesign Studio GRAFIQUE

Description:

Webdesign, grafický design, fotografie a marketing. Webdesign studio GRAFIQUE Brno offers web design, logo and identity creation, graphic design for print, SEO, online marketing, and photography services.

Key Services:
Web design and developmentGraphic design and corporate identitySEO and online marketingCreative and advertising photography
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGravity FormsGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsjQueryTyped.jsFoundation framework
Frameworks:
Foundation
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjar
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Hotjar
Marketing Tools:
Hotjar
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:example.com ip4:192.72.10.10 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:81.91.92.221
Name Servers:
ns.web4u.czDNS only
ns2.web4u.czDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx4.googlemail.com
10: aspmx5.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2023071801, TTL: 14400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:121ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:example.com ip4:192.72.10.10 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Foundation framework and several JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Typed.js for enhanced UI effects. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently with caching and minification. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in asset loading and script management.
Analyze Another Website