Skip to main content

Is graftik.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Graftik Digital Design Studio Reviews

graftik.com favicon

Is graftik.com Safe? Security Analysis for Graftik Digital Design Studio

Check if graftik.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
jQueryGSAP (TweenMax)Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Pixel+1 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 8:20:16 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Graftik Digital Design Studio is a professional digital design agency based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in branding, web development, and multimedia services. The company positions itself as a leading design studio in the Baltic region, targeting brands and organizations seeking tailored digital design solutions. Their website showcases multiple case studies and partner logos, indicating a solid client base and market presence. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and GSAP for animations, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, with a cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy by default. Security-wise, while HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), the site lacks visible security headers and published security policies, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information appear professional and consistent with the business claims. Overall, the site demonstrates good digital maturity with room for security and compliance enhancements.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGSAP (TweenMax)Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelCookieConsent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Graftik operates in the technology sector as a small-sized digital design studio with a focus on branding, web, and multimedia services. Their business model revolves around providing bespoke digital design solutions to a diverse client base, including banks, cultural institutions, and commercial brands. The presence of multiple partner logos and detailed case studies suggests a well-established market position in Latvia and the Baltic region. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and long-term client engagements. The company targets organizations requiring professional digital branding and development services, leveraging a portfolio that highlights quality and creativity. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The website content is professionally crafted with consistent branding, supporting a high level of business credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@graftik.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716610****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture. It uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent with default denial of ad and analytics storage, reflecting GDPR compliance awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The use of third-party analytics and tracking tools is managed with user consent, minimizing privacy risks. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small digital agency but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Graftik Digital Design Studio

Description:

Leading design studio in Riga offering web development and branding services. Get tailored digital design solutions from our professionals.

Key Services:
Brand identity designWeb and mobile developmentMultimedia presentations and interactive installations
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGSAP (TweenMax)Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelCookieConsent
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with consent denied by default
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

43/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.graftik.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:159.148.57.35
Name Servers:
ns1.linode.comDNS only
ns2.linode.comDNS only
ns3.linode.comDNS only
ns4.linode.comDNS only
ns5.linode.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.graftik.com
SOA:Serial: 2021000077, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:83ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.graftik.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery and GSAP for animations, supported by Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site loads external CSS and JS resources from reputable CDNs, improving performance and reliability. The presence of cookie consent scripts indicates compliance with privacy regulations. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. However, no CMS or backend platform is identified from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site security and trustworthiness.
Analyze Another Website