Skip to main content

Is gramatvedibaseksperts.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - gramatvedibaseksperts.lv Reviews

gramatvedibaseksperts.lv favicon

Is gramatvedibaseksperts.lv Safe? Security Analysis for L.Kelmeres birojs | grāmatvedības pakalpojums | grāmatvedības konsultācijas | privātstundas | kursi un semināri | materiāli grāmatvedībā | Rīga, Latvia

Check if gramatvedibaseksperts.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:37:34 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.gramatvedibaseksperts.lv is currently inaccessible for comprehensive analysis due to WHOIS query limits and apparent web application firewall or rate limiting protections. The site appears to be built on the Wix platform, but the content is heavily scripted and truncated, preventing extraction of meaningful business, contact, or policy information. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, nor are there any visible contact details or forms. The lack of accessible WHOIS data and website content limits the ability to assess the domain's legitimacy or the company's business profile. Security posture cannot be evaluated due to missing headers and SSL details. Overall, the site is effectively blocked from detailed inspection, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible content and WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. The site likely represents a small business or individual entity given the Wix platform usage, but no details on market positioning, services, or partnerships are available. The lack of contact information and policies further limits business credibility assessment.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

l*****@gmail.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be properly assessed because of the lack of accessible security headers, SSL configuration details, and absence of visible security or incident response policies. The presence of WAF or rate limiting mechanisms indicates some level of security control, but no further insights can be drawn. No vulnerabilities or compliance gaps are identifiable from the available data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Ensure WHOIS data is publicly accessible or use a WHOIS provider with higher query limits to enable domain legitimacy verification.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

WHOIS query limit exceeded error and no WHOIS data available; HTML content truncated and appears to be a Wix site with heavy script protections and no visible business content. Likely WAF or rate limiting blocking full access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.230.63.107
Name Servers:
ns1.businessmedia.lvDNS only
ns2.businessmedia.lvDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2016032102, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:123ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Wix platform, as indicated by meta tags and script sources. However, the content is heavily scripted with advanced JavaScript protections and polyfills, which combined with WHOIS query limits, prevent full content extraction. No performance or accessibility metrics can be reliably measured. The site lacks visible SEO optimization elements or structured data. Hosting provider details are not discernible. Overall, the technical implementation appears standard for a Wix site but is obscured by security controls.
Analyze Another Website