Skip to main content

Is grasisg.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA GRASIS G Reviews

grasisg.lv favicon

Is grasisg.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA GRASIS G

Check if grasisg.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPress 6.2.6jQuery 3.6.4Bootstrap 4/5 (CSS and JS)FontAwesomeGoogle reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:53:09 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA GRASIS G is a Latvian small business specializing in construction machinery rental and related services, primarily focusing on crane rental and maintenance. The company positions itself as a reliable and professional partner in the construction and maintenance sectors, offering services such as dangerous tree cutting and power line pole replacement. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear contact information and a privacy policy, indicating compliance with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and registration details. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small regional service provider.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.2.6jQuery 3.6.4Bootstrap 4/5 (CSS and JS)FontAwesomeGoogle reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation and manufacturing sectors, targeting construction companies and private clients in Latvia. Its business model revolves around equipment rental and service provision, with a focus on cranes and related heavy machinery. The website content and structure suggest a local market focus with moderate branding consistency. The presence of a Google Form for contact indicates a digital approach to customer engagement. No social media or partner domains were identified, suggesting limited digital marketing or partnership ecosystem. The company appears to maintain a straightforward service offering without extensive certifications or security policies publicly disclosed.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

g*****@inbox.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712948****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect user interactions, which are positive security measures. However, the lack of visible HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is indicated by the presence of a privacy policy and cookie consent banner. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with additional headers, policies, and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA GRASIS G

Description:

Company provides construction machinery rental and service, specializing in crane rental and related services such as dangerous tree cutting and power line pole replacement.

Key Services:
Autoceltņu noma (Crane rental)Serviss (Service and maintenance)Bīstamu koku zāģēšana (Dangerous tree cutting)Elektrolīniju stabu nomaiņa (Power line pole replacement)
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.2.6jQuery 3.6.4Bootstrap 4/5 (CSS and JS)FontAwesomeGoogle reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based small business site for construction machinery rental and services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:213.21.208.12 ip4:185.47.11.3 ip4:185.47.11.4 ip4:151.80.165.221 ip4:62.75.208.87 a mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1288-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:213.21.208.12
Name Servers:
host3.itap.lvDNS only
ns2.itap.lvDNS only
ns3.itap.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.grasisg.lv
20: mail.grasisg.lv
SOA:Serial: 2023112829, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:171ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:213.21.208.12 ip4:185.47.11.3 ip4:185.47.11.4 ip4:151.80.165.221 ip4:62.75.208.87 a mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.2.6 using Bootstrap for responsive design and FontAwesome for icons. It loads jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA v3 scripts for functionality and security. The site uses a cookie consent banner indicating GDPR compliance. Performance appears moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Hosting provider and DNS details are not disclosed in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website