Skip to main content

Is grass.io a Scam? Security Check Results - grass.io Reviews

grass.io favicon

Is grass.io Safe? Security Analysis for Get rewarded for the internet you don't use

Check if grass.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsChakra UI
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:08:10 AM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Grass.io is a technology-focused website promoting an app that rewards users for sharing their unused internet bandwidth. The business model centers around monetizing idle internet resources via a background-running app, targeting general internet users interested in earning rewards. The website presents a professional and modern design using React and Next.js frameworks, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the site lacks critical compliance and security disclosures such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information, which impacts trust and regulatory adherence. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates domain legitimacy verification. Security posture is weak due to missing security headers and unclear SSL configuration. Overall, the site is functional and visually appealing but requires significant improvements in privacy, security, and transparency to enhance credibility and compliance.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsChakra UI

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Grass.io operates in the technology sector with a niche focus on internet bandwidth monetization through a rewards app. The business targets general consumers who want to earn rewards passively. The company appears small in scale with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or trust signals limits insight into market positioning and competitive advantages. No partner or payment processor domains were identified. The business model relies on app downloads and background internet usage, suggesting revenue streams from data monetization or partnerships. Growth potential depends on user adoption and trust, which currently is hindered by missing compliance and contact details.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website's security posture is minimal. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and no incident response or security policy pages are present. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. No SSL configuration details were found in the provided data, and no security best practices are observable. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content, but the lack of security controls and transparency suggests a low maturity level in security management.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Grass turns the unused part of your internet into rewards. Just download the app, let it run in the background, and start earning.

Key Services:
internet bandwidth monetizationmobile app rewards
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsChakra UI
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "origin-when-cross-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:support@wynd.network
Forensic Reports:nikki@wynd.network

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.grass.io
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M04
Valid Until:5/20/2026 (255 days)
SANs:*.grass.io, grass.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(225 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.13.205, 104.18.12.205
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:dcd, 2606:4700::6812:ccd
Name Servers:
graham.ns.cloudflare.com
tina.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2382325539, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:145ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React, Next.js, and Chakra UI, indicating a contemporary frontend architecture. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate based on the structure and resource loading patterns. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, which may be positive for privacy but limits marketing insights. The lack of security headers and compliance documents represents technical debt and risk areas that should be addressed to improve overall site robustness and trustworthiness.
Analyze Another Website