Skip to main content

Is gravitybridge.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Gravity Bridge Reviews

gravitybridge.net favicon

Is gravitybridge.net Safe? Security Analysis for Gravity Bridge

Check if gravitybridge.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Wix.com Website BuilderJavaScriptSentry (error monitoring)Core-js polyfillsFocus-within polyfill+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:50:31 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Gravity Bridge operates as an open, decentralized blockchain interoperability platform focused on bridging ecosystems such as Cosmos and Ethereum. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting blockchain developers and decentralized finance users. The business model centers on providing decentralized bridging services to unlock liquidity and interoperability between blockchains. Technically, the website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing standard JavaScript libraries and polyfills, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no contact information is provided for security or general inquiries. The domain WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain legitimacy or recent registration status. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in security transparency, privacy compliance, and domain registration clarity.

Detected Technologies

Wix.com Website BuilderJavaScriptSentry (error monitoring)Core-js polyfillsFocus-within polyfillIntl Segmenter polyfill

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gravity Bridge occupies a niche in the blockchain interoperability market, offering decentralized bridging solutions between Cosmos and Ethereum. The company targets a specialized audience of blockchain developers and DeFi participants. The business model is technology-driven, focusing on open-source and decentralized infrastructure. The website lacks detailed business information such as founding year or company size, and no partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned. The absence of WHOIS data and contact details limits trust signals. The platform's reliance on Wix suggests a small to medium-sized operation with a focus on rapid deployment rather than custom infrastructure. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed on the website.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The absence of contact information for incident response or security inquiries further weakens the security maturity. The use of Sentry for error monitoring is a positive indicator but limited in scope. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, security headers, and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Gravity Bridge

Description:

Gravity Bridge is an open, decentralized bridge that unlocks the power of interoperability & liquidity between blockchain ecosystems like Cosmos and Ethereum.

Key Services:
Decentralized bridge between Cosmos and Ethereum ecosystems
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Wix.com Website BuilderJavaScriptSentry (error monitoring)Core-js polyfillsFocus-within polyfillIntl Segmenter polyfill
Platforms:
Wix
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Sentry
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Sentry
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and polyfills

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:185.230.63.171, 185.230.63.186, 185.230.63.107
Name Servers:
ns2.wixdns.netDNS only
ns3.wixdns.netDNS only
MX Records:
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
40: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
50: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2022121519, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:156ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging standard JavaScript libraries and polyfills for compatibility and performance. The hosting and CMS are Wix, which provides moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO features are basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no advanced SEO or accessibility enhancements detected. The site uses Sentry for error monitoring, indicating some level of operational monitoring. There is no evidence of custom backend infrastructure or advanced frameworks. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of explicit security headers. Opportunities exist to improve performance, accessibility, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website