Skip to main content

Is greenspace.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Green Space Reviews

greenspace.lv favicon

Is greenspace.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Green Space

Check if greenspace.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:07:37 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Green Space is a Latvian company specializing in the manufacturing of nearly zero-energy modular houses primarily constructed from laminated solid wood. The company offers a variety of house models with delivery timelines starting from eight months. Their business model includes direct sales of modular houses complemented by financing partnerships with major Latvian banks, positioning them as a niche player in sustainable housing within the Latvian market. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with a privacy policy available and GDPR considerations evident. Overall, the company presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence with moderate technical maturity and good business credibility.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Green Space operates in the real estate and manufacturing sectors, focusing on energy-efficient modular housing. Their competitive advantage lies in offering sustainable, nearly zero-energy homes with financing options through established banking partners like Citadele, SEB, and Swedbank. The company targets environmentally conscious home buyers in Latvia and potentially neighboring regions. The partnership ecosystem includes financial institutions and government agencies such as the Latvian Investment and Development Agency, which co-finances their projects. The business appears small-sized with a focused market niche. The website content and social media presence support their market positioning and growth potential.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@greenspace.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712575****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive information. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. No signs of malware, phishing, or other security threats were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Green Space

Description:

Green Space manufactures nearly zero-energy modular houses primarily made of laminated solid wood, offering various house models with delivery starting from 8 months.

Key Services:
Modular house manufacturingHouse model portfolioDemo house visitsFinancing assistance via banking partners
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and images

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.107.198.47 ip4:81.198.75.0/24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.107.198.47
Name Servers:
ns.itworks.lvDNS only
ns3.itworks.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: greenspace-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025070903, TTL: 1200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:122ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.107.198.47 ip4:81.198.75.0/24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering for performance. It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and layout. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Hosting provider details are not evident. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website