Skip to main content

Is gridasundurvis.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - TCgrupa Reviews

gridasundurvis.lv favicon

Is gridasundurvis.lv Safe? Security Analysis for TCgrupa

Check if gridasundurvis.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryLayerSliderSlider Revolution+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:39:09 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

TCgrupa is a Latvian company specializing in high-quality wooden materials for home interiors, exteriors, and terraces, including stairs, floorboards, and doors. The website targets both professionals such as architects and builders, as well as individual customers interested in wooden home products. The business operates primarily in the regional market with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins like LayerSlider, WPML, and Contact Form 7, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security features.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryLayerSliderSlider RevolutionContact Form 7Responsive LightboxWPML

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

TCgrupa operates in the wood materials sector, offering a range of products including oak wood, thermally treated wood, and Siberian larch. The business model includes B2B and B2C sales, serving professionals and end consumers. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized company with a local market focus. The absence of certifications or trust badges indicates potential growth opportunities in establishing stronger market credibility. The company maintains a partnership with a local service provider (yoursite.lv) for website hosting or development. The lack of social media presence on the site may limit marketing reach. Overall, TCgrupa appears to be a niche player with a focus on quality and customer service.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@tcgrupa.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716714****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The site uses standard WordPress plugins, which if kept updated, reduce vulnerability risks. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent banner, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security issues. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy further reduces security maturity. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy compliance, and incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and implement a cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

TCgrupa

Description:

TCgrupa offers high-quality wooden materials including stairs, floorboards, doors, and other types of boards for home interiors, exteriors, and terraces.

Key Services:
Wooden floorboardsWooden stairsWooden doorsThermally treated wood productsSiberian larch wood products
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryLayerSliderSlider RevolutionContact Form 7Responsive LightboxWPML
Frameworks:
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and WPML usage)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

šŸ›”ļøSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

šŸ‘¤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

šŸ›”ļøNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

šŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

šŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 17 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

šŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:65.108.127.35
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1747647346, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:180ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

⚔Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

šŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.0.1 with WPBakery Page Builder and uses several plugins including LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, Responsive Lightbox, and WPML for multilingual support. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources like Google Fonts. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization indicators found. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and hreflang attributes for language variants. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from performance and accessibility enhancements.
Analyze Another Website