Skip to main content

Is groduakas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - groduakas.lv Reviews

G

Is groduakas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if groduakas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:03:49 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website groduakas.lv currently serves a BitNinja anti-robot CAPTCHA challenge page, blocking direct access to its actual content. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to mitigate automated malicious traffic or abuse. The page itself is minimal, providing no business or contact information, and uses outdated CMS meta tags (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal) suggesting legacy or placeholder content. The technical infrastructure includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. However, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact details or social media links are found. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, preventing verification of domain registration details. Overall, the site’s security posture is basic with some best practices like HTTPS and CAPTCHA, but lacks security headers and up-to-date CMS versions. The business credibility and content quality are low due to lack of accessible content and information.

Detected Technologies

Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the site being blocked by a security challenge, no direct business information or market positioning can be determined. The presence of multiple CMS meta tags suggests the site may be under development or misconfigured. No contact information, company name, or sector details are available. The site appears to be small scale or inactive from a business perspective. No partnerships or related domains are identified. The tracking tools indicate some level of digital marketing intent, but the lack of content and policies limits business credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs BitNinja’s security service to block suspicious visitors via CAPTCHA, indicating a proactive approach to mitigating automated threats. HTTPS is enforced as external scripts load over secure connections. However, no security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) are detected in the HTML content, and the CMS versions indicated are outdated and vulnerable. No privacy or incident response policies are published. The site’s security score is limited by the blocking mechanism and lack of transparency. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces trust. Overall, the security posture is basic with room for significant improvement in headers, CMS updates, and policy publication.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

Site is protected by BitNinja security service presenting a CAPTCHA challenge to verify visitor is not a bot. Access to actual site content is blocked until CAPTCHA is solved.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by recaptcha and scripts loaded over HTTPS)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a BitNinja anti-robot CAPTCHA challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.205 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.88 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:83.149.95.205
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: groduakas.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071701, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.205 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.88 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal) as indicated by meta tags, which are no longer supported and pose security risks. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing analytics. Google reCAPTCHA v2 is implemented to prevent automated abuse. The page is served over HTTPS, but no advanced security headers are detected. The site’s performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. The content is minimal and primarily a security gate, limiting user experience and SEO effectiveness. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is outdated and requires modernization to improve security and user experience.
Analyze Another Website