Skip to main content

Is groupfi.com a Scam? Security Check Results - groupfi.com Reviews

G

Is groupfi.com Safe? Security Analysis for groupfi.com

Check if groupfi.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:11:52 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at groupfi.com/lander is currently a minimal placeholder or parking page with very limited content and no visible business information. The domain is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC since 2011, indicating a mature domain age, but the website itself does not reflect an active or developed business presence. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on JavaScript and a parking platform (PW), with Google Adsense integrated for advertising. There are no visible security policies, privacy statements, or contact details, which limits trust and compliance assessment. Security posture is minimal with no advanced headers or protections detected, and no evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms. Overall, the site appears inactive or under development, with low content quality and poor user experience.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of business-related content, no clear market positioning, business model, or target audience can be identified. The domain age suggests potential for an established business, but the absence of company details, contact information, or service descriptions indicates the site is not currently serving a commercial or operational role. The presence of Google Adsense suggests monetization attempts through advertising rather than direct business services. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the content or linked domains.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, with no security headers detected and DNSSEC not enabled. The domain status flags provide some protection against unauthorized changes, but the website lacks privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No forms or user inputs are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The site does not demonstrate compliance with GDPR or other data protection frameworks. Overall, the security maturity is low, and improvements are needed to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Platforms:
PW (Parking Lander)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and appears to be a parking or placeholder page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:15.197.148.33, 3.33.130.190
Name Servers:
ns33.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns34.domaincontrol.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2023112600, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:107ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a minimal JavaScript-based parking platform with deferred loading of scripts and CSS from wsimg.com, indicating a third-party parking service. Hosting is via GoDaddy.com, LLC, with domain name servers at domaincontrol.com. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but lacks optimization for SEO and accessibility. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tag present but no further enhancements. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Adsense advertising script. The site lacks structured data, meta tags, or Open Graph tags, limiting SEO and social media integration.
Analyze Another Website