Is groza.io Safe? Security Analysis for iEXExchanger FZCO
Check if groza.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Groza.io is an online exchanger platform developed by iEXExchanger FZCO, launched in 2024. The platform appears to offer currency or cryptocurrency exchange services targeting a general audience. The website uses modern web technologies including Angular and Material Design components, with integration of identity verification via Sumsub SDK and analytics via Yandex Metrika. The domain is newly registered with privacy protection, which is common for financial service platforms to protect registrant privacy. However, the website lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Groza.io operates in the technology sector as a small-sized online exchanger service, likely focusing on currency or cryptocurrency exchange. The business model is service-oriented, providing an online platform for exchange transactions. The company is newly founded in 2024 and developed by iEXExchanger FZCO, indicating a startup phase. The partnership with iexexchanger.com suggests a broader ecosystem or shared infrastructure. The lack of detailed business information and contact data limits transparency but is typical for new online financial services. Growth potential depends on establishing trust, compliance, and expanding service offerings.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (2)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, which is a gap for user assurance and regulatory compliance. The use of Sumsub SDK indicates some level of identity verification, enhancing security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, security maturity is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
iEXExchanger FZCO
Groza is an online exchanger platform, likely offering currency or cryptocurrency exchange services.
basic
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited
- Auto-renew enabled
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a newly launched online exchanger platform
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 62 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings