Skip to main content

Is grsm.io a Scam? Security Check Results - PartnerStack Reviews

P

Is grsm.io Safe? Security Analysis for PartnerStack

Check if grsm.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyCanadamedium
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:54:36 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at grsm.io is registered to PartnerStack, a Canadian technology company founded in 2016. However, the accessible website content is minimal, consisting solely of a single word 'Success.' with no metadata, forms, or visible business information. This suggests the site is either under development or access is restricted by a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security challenge. The domain registration details are consistent and legitimate, indicating a trustworthy ownership. Due to the lack of accessible content, a comprehensive analysis of business operations, services, and compliance cannot be performed. The technical infrastructure appears to be hosted or protected by Cloudflare, but no further technology stack details are available.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

PartnerStack is positioned as a technology company based in Canada with a domain age consistent with a medium-sized business. The lack of visible content or business descriptions limits insights into their market positioning, business model, or partnerships. No contact information or trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials are present on the accessible site. The domain is registered with Cloudflare, which may indicate a focus on security and performance, but the absence of public-facing content restricts further business intelligence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the minimal accessible content and probable WAF blocking. WHOIS data shows no privacy protection, which supports transparency. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the content. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent. Overall, the security maturity appears low based on accessible data, but the use of Cloudflare suggests some baseline protection.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Ensure the website content is accessible to allow proper analysis and user engagement.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Cloudflare Detected

Minimal HTML content with only 'Success.' text and Cloudflare registrar indicates possible WAF or security challenge blocking full content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Company:

PartnerStack

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and likely blocked by Cloudflare WAF or security challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:grsm.io
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/8/2025 (31 days)
SANs:grsm.io, *.grsm.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(253 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.11.212, 104.18.10.212
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:ad4, 2606:4700::6812:bd4
Name Servers:
javon.ns.cloudflare.com
sara.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2380983928, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:140ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted or protected by Cloudflare, as indicated by the registrar and nameservers. The HTML content is minimal and lacks metadata, scripts, or visible technology indicators. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. The domain is active and not expired, but the site appears to be blocked or under restricted access, limiting technical assessment. There is an opportunity to modernize and improve the site by adding structured data, metadata, and user-facing content.
Analyze Another Website