Skip to main content

Is grstone.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - GR Stone Reviews

grstone.lv favicon

Is grstone.lv Safe? Security Analysis for GR Stone

Check if grstone.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressElementorElementor ProGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:19:59 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

GR Stone is a Latvian small business specializing in the fabrication and installation of stone surfaces for residential and commercial properties, including kitchens, bathrooms, and fireplaces. The company offers high-quality stone materials such as Technistone, Silestone, Dekton, and natural stone, targeting customers seeking elegant and durable stone design solutions. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with good SEO and mobile optimization, supporting the company's digital presence effectively. Contact information and social media links are clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, and uses HTTPS to secure communications. However, security headers are minimal, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. No forms or sensitive data collection points are visible on the homepage, reducing immediate risk exposure. The security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of comprehensive security headers and privacy policies suggests the need for enhancements to meet GDPR and general security standards. The domain WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy and registration consistency. Overall, the website appears legitimate and professionally maintained, but would benefit from improved privacy and security disclosures. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, enhancing security headers, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and maintaining up-to-date software to mitigate risks. These steps will strengthen trust, compliance, and security posture, supporting sustainable business growth.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorElementor ProGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GR Stone operates in a niche market within Latvia, focusing on stone surface solutions for home and commercial interiors. Its competitive advantage lies in offering exclusive stone design solutions with premium materials and personalized installation services. The business model is primarily B2C with potential B2B engagements. Revenue streams likely come from material sales and installation services. The company targets homeowners and interior designers seeking quality stone surfaces. Growth indicators include active social media presence and updated website content. The partnership ecosystem includes suppliers of branded stone materials like Technistone and Silestone. Strategic observations suggest a localized market focus with opportunities to expand digital marketing and compliance to enhance market position.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

I*****@GRSTONE.LV

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712987****

Company Registration

Registration Number:

50203305971

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential gaps that could be exploited. Compliance with GDPR is minimal due to missing privacy and cookie policies and absence of consent mechanisms. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may delay response to security events. Data protection practices appear basic, with no forms collecting sensitive data on the homepage. Overall, the security culture seems nascent, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and technical controls to reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

GR Stone

Description:

Ekskluzīvi akmens dizaina risinājumi jūsu mājoklim. Akmens virsmas virtuvei, vannas istabai un kamīna apdare. Augstākās kvalitātes serviss.

Key Services:
Stone surfaces for kitchensStone surfaces for bathroomsFireplace stone finishingSales of Technistone, Silestone, Dekton, and natural stone materials
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorElementor ProGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsjQuery
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected collecting sensitive data on homepage

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:85.254.144.33 include:alphahost.lv include:mx2.alphahost.lv +a +mx ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:85.254.144.33
Name Servers:
ns1.alphahost.lvDNS only
ns2.alphahost.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073006, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:85.254.144.33 include:alphahost.lv include:mx2.alphahost.lv +a +mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor and Elementor Pro page builders, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from trusted sources and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA and skip links present but no advanced features detected. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data for organization and articles. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The technical stack is standard for small business websites, with opportunities to improve security headers and privacy compliance.
Analyze Another Website