Skip to main content

Is grweb.site a Scam? Security Check Results - GetResponse sp. z o.o. Reviews

G

Is grweb.site Safe? Security Analysis for GetResponse sp. z o.o.

Check if grweb.site is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherPolandsmall
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 12:34:27 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The domain grweb.site is registered to GetResponse sp. z o.o., a company based in Poland, with a registration date in 2021 and a valid expiry in 2026. However, the website content is currently inaccessible beyond a 404 error page, indicating that the site is either inactive or under construction. There is no visible business content, contact information, or policies on the site, which severely limits the ability to assess the company's online presence or service offerings. The domain registration data is consistent and legitimate, but the lack of website content reduces trust and credibility. From a technical perspective, the site shows no evidence of modern web technologies, analytics, or security headers. DNS is hosted on Azure DNS servers, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No HTTPS or SSL certificate information was provided, and no security best practices are observed in the HTML content. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance concern. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of contact details and policies further reduces the site's compliance and trustworthiness. There is no indication of WAF or blocking mechanisms, so the site is accessible but non-functional. Overall, the website currently serves as a placeholder or error page with minimal technical implementation and no business or security content. This results in a low AI score and high risk from a user trust and compliance perspective. Strategic recommendations include deploying a functional website with clear business information, implementing HTTPS and security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, and providing contact and incident response details to improve trust and compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain is registered to GetResponse sp. z o.o., a Polish company likely related to the GetResponse brand known for email marketing and online marketing services. However, the analyzed domain does not present any business content or services, suggesting it may be a secondary or placeholder domain. The lack of website content prevents analysis of market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated on the site. The domain age is moderate (since 2021), which aligns with a relatively new or secondary web presence. Without active content, the domain does not currently contribute to the company's business intelligence or competitive advantage.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is poor. There is no evidence of HTTPS or SSL configuration, no security headers detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled on the domain. The site does not provide any security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No forms or inputs are present to assess secure data handling. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security controls and transparency, which poses risks to user trust and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

GetResponse sp. z o.o.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently a 404 error page with no substantive content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:178.16.117.35
Name Servers:
ns1-07.azure-dns.comDNS only
ns2-07.azure-dns.netDNS only
ns3-07.azure-dns.orgDNS only
ns4-07.azure-dns.infoDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:102ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a 404 error page with minimal HTML and CSS styling. No JavaScript libraries, analytics, or tracking scripts are present. DNS is hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS servers, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The site appears to lack HTTPS, security headers, and any meta tags beyond basic viewport and charset. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic at best. SEO is poor due to lack of content and metadata. The technical infrastructure is minimal and requires significant development to support a professional business website.
Analyze Another Website