Skip to main content

Is gsr.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Domain Protection Services, Inc. Reviews

gsr.io favicon

Is gsr.io Safe? Security Analysis for Domain Protection Services, Inc.

Check if gsr.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Statesmedium
JavaScriptOneTrust Cookie ConsentGoogle Tag ManagerLinkedIn Insight TagMicrosoft Clarity
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:26:24 AM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

GSR Markets operates as a crypto trading firm and liquidity provider specializing in capital markets solutions for the cryptocurrency industry. Their services include market making, OTC trading, and risk management, targeting institutional investors and trading firms. The company has an established presence since 2013 and positions itself as a trusted partner in crypto capital markets. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Astro and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, with a CMS likely being Craft CMS. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, and employs industry-standard analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Overall, the website presents a professional and credible front with moderate tracking and good privacy compliance, but could improve transparency around privacy policies and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptOneTrust Cookie ConsentGoogle Tag ManagerLinkedIn Insight TagMicrosoft Clarity

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GSR Markets is positioned in the finance sector, specifically within cryptocurrency trading and liquidity provision. Their business model revolves around providing market making and OTC trading services to institutional clients, which suggests a B2B focus. The company benefits from a decade-long domain age, indicating stability and experience. Their marketing ecosystem includes major analytics and tracking platforms, supporting data-driven growth strategies. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a controlled communication channel via contact forms, typical for financial firms. No subsidiaries or parent companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The company leverages professional branding and consistent messaging to build trust in a competitive crypto market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS and clientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized domain transfers. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent areas for improvement. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could hinder transparency and trust in security matters. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the industry but with room for enhancement in policy transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Domain Protection Services, Inc.

Description:

GSR is Crypto’s Capital Markets Partner. We specialize in providing trading solutions, market making, and risk management.

Key Services:
Market MakingOTC TradingTrading SolutionsRisk Management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptOneTrust Cookie ConsentGoogle Tag ManagerLinkedIn Insight TagMicrosoft Clarity
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityLinkedIn Insight
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)LinkedIn Insight TagMicrosoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "strict-origin-when-cross-origin,no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

78/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 912-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:13.250.173.68 ip4:13.230.147.76 ip4:52.29.139.191 ip4:18.168.81.225 ip4:54.240.74.149 ip4:54.240.43.16 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(912-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@gsr.io
Forensic Reports:dmarc@gsr.io

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(100 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.17.124.41
Name Servers:
ns-1136.awsdns-14.org
ns-1866.awsdns-41.co.uk
ns-679.awsdns-20.net
ns-96.awsdns-12.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:13.250.173.68 ip4:13.230.147.76 ip4:52.29.139.191 ip4:18.168.81.225 ip4:54.240.74.149 ip4:54.240.43.16 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including Astro framework and Craft CMS, hosted on AWS infrastructure. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content and third-party scripts. No broken elements or errors were detected in the provided HTML. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations. Technical risks are minimal but could be further reduced by enabling DNSSEC and enhancing security headers.
Analyze Another Website