Skip to main content

Is guildofguardians.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Guild of Guardians Reviews

guildofguardians.com favicon

Is guildofguardians.com Safe? Security Analysis for Guild of Guardians

Check if guildofguardians.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Auth0 SPA JSGoogle Tag ManagerSegment AnalyticsTikTok PixelTwitter Universal Website Tag+4 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 8:54:56 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Guild of Guardians operates a fantasy RPG mobile game with blockchain and NFT integration, targeting gamers interested in strategic team building and dungeon exploration. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern analytics and authentication technologies, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and Auth0 authentication, though improvements in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data slightly reduces trust but is mitigated by the professional web presence and official partnerships. Overall, the site presents a credible and engaging platform for its audience.

Detected Technologies

Auth0 SPA JSGoogle Tag ManagerSegment AnalyticsTikTok PixelTwitter Universal Website TagjQuerySwiper.jsSlick CarouselWebflow CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Guild of Guardians positions itself in the niche blockchain gaming market, leveraging NFT marketplaces and community engagement to drive growth. Its partnerships with Immutable and other ecosystem platforms enhance its competitive advantage. The business model relies on free-to-play mechanics supplemented by in-game purchases and NFT trading. The company targets a medium-sized audience of gamers and blockchain enthusiasts, with a strong social media presence supporting community building. The lack of explicit company registration details suggests privacy protection common in this sector.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and use of a reputable authentication provider (Auth0). However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing a cookie consent banner to enhance privacy compliance and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to foster trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Guild of Guardians

Description:

Guild of Guardians is a fantasy RPG mobile game where players assemble teams of Guardians to battle and explore the world of Elderym. The game features strategic combat, character customization, and a marketplace ecosystem.

Key Services:
Mobile RPG gameNFT marketplaceCommunity events and leaderboards
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Auth0 SPA JSGoogle Tag ManagerSegment AnalyticsTikTok PixelTwitter Universal Website TagjQuerySwiper.jsSlick CarouselWebflow CMS
Frameworks:
Webflow CMS
Platforms:
Mobile (iOS and Android apps linked)Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Auth0 for secure authentication
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies with SameSite=Lax

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Segment AnalyticsGoogle Analytics (via GTM)TikTok AnalyticsFacebook AnalyticsTwitter Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Tracking Pixels:
TikTok PixelFacebook PixelTwitter Universal Website TagSegment Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Segment Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1264-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@immutable.com
Forensic Reports:4617decf3d4a179@for.dmarcanalyzer.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(214 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
ns-1252.awsdns-28.org
ns-1796.awsdns-32.co.uk
ns-220.awsdns-27.com
ns-877.awsdns-45.net
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS with extensive use of modern JavaScript libraries including Auth0 SPA SDK for authentication, Segment for analytics, and multiple tracking pixels for marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and integrates smoothly with app stores for iOS and Android. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, but the absence of some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates minor technical debt in compliance and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website