Skip to main content

Is gundega.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Gundega.lv Reviews

gundega.lv favicon

Is gundega.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Gundega.lv

Check if gundega.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.2PHPjQueryGoogle FontsFacebook SDK+6 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:35:42 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Gundega.lv represents the official website of the Latvian University Student Corporation Gundega, an academic and closed lifetime organization founded in 1923. The site serves as a platform to communicate the corporation's history, activities, and events primarily targeting Latvian university students and academic community members. The business model is non-profit and educational, focusing on cultural and academic growth through organized events and membership activities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern plugin ecosystem supporting galleries, reviews, and social sharing, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which presents compliance and risk gaps. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2PHPjQueryGoogle FontsFacebook SDKPhoto Gallery pluginContact Form 7Penci Review pluginPenci Recipe pluginPenci Portfolio pluginSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization holds a strong market position as the second oldest student corporation in Latvia with a centennial legacy. Its competitive advantage lies in its academic affiliation and cultural heritage. The business operates through event organization, membership drives, and community engagement. Revenue streams are likely limited to membership fees and donations typical for non-profit academic entities. The target customer segment is university students, particularly females, as indicated by event invitations. Growth indicators include active social media presence and regular content updates. The partnership ecosystem is limited but includes social media platforms for outreach. Strategic observations suggest a need for digital modernization in compliance and security to maintain trust and regulatory adherence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is implemented, but the absence of critical security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options weakens the defense against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of GDPR indicators. Data protection practices are minimal, with no visible DPO contact or security framework adherence. The security culture appears informal, typical for small non-profit organizations, but improvements are necessary to mitigate risks and enhance user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Gundega.lv

Description:

LATVIJAS UNIVERSITĀTES STUDENŠU KORPORĀCIJA GUNDEGA ir akadēmiska, slēgta mūža organizācija, kas dibināta 1923. gada 29. novembrī. Studenšu korporācija, kas veicina akadēmisko izaugsmi, sociālo mijiedarbību un kultūras vērtību saglabāšanu.

Key Services:
Studenšu korporācijas darbībaViesu vakaru organizēšanaKultūras un akadēmisko pasākumu rīkošanaUzņemšana jaunām studentes
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2PHPjQueryGoogle FontsFacebook SDKPhoto Gallery pluginContact Form 7Penci Review pluginPenci Recipe pluginPenci Portfolio pluginSwiper.js
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Facebook SDK asynchronously

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook SDK
Marketing Tools:
Social media sharing plugins
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based academic student corporation site in Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

11 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.74.196
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.latnet.lv
50: mx2.latnet.lv
100: mx3.latnet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:189ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a WordPress CMS with a variety of plugins for enhanced functionality including photo galleries, reviews, recipes, and portfolio management. The front-end leverages jQuery and Google Fonts, with asynchronous loading of Facebook SDK for social integration. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading implemented but some images show loading errors. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, the site lacks advanced security configurations and detailed WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which limits full technical trust verification.
Analyze Another Website