Skip to main content

Is gutentor.com a Scam? Security Check Results - gutentor Reviews

gutentor.com favicon

Is gutentor.com Safe? Security Analysis for gutentor

Check if gutentor.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPressPHPJavaScriptjQueryGoogle Fonts+3 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 11:19:37 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Gutentor is a WordPress plugin company specializing in advanced page building blocks for the Gutenberg editor. The company targets designers, developers, freelancers, agencies, marketers, and entrepreneurs seeking a modern, easy-to-use page builder integrated with WordPress core. The website positions Gutentor as a feature-rich, fast, and flexible solution with a growing user base of over 38,000 active installations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and Litespeed cache optimizations. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, with good use of structured data and meta tags. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and security headers present, but lacks published security policies or incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data reduces trust somewhat, but the active community presence and professional site design support legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPJavaScriptjQueryGoogle FontsFontAwesomeLitespeed Cache CSSMediaElement.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gutentor operates in the technology sector as a small-sized company focused on WordPress plugin development. Its business model revolves around providing a free core plugin with premium features and templates, targeting a niche market of WordPress users who want enhanced Gutenberg block capabilities. The company leverages partnerships such as Templateberg for template distribution and maintains an active support ecosystem including documentation, forums, and video tutorials. Growth indicators include a substantial active installation base and consistent content updates. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its ease of use, speed optimization, and comprehensive block library. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance trust by publishing more detailed business and security information and expanding direct contact channels.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Gutentor’s website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the site lacks explicit security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms such as security.txt. There are no dedicated contact channels for security or abuse reporting, which could hinder timely incident management. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by formalizing security governance and communication channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

gutentor

Description:

Gutentor is the best WordPress Page Builder for Gutenberg. Create masterpiece, pixel perfect websites using modern WordPress way. You might be SURPRISED by all the FEATURES onboard at First!

Key Services:
WordPress page building blocksGutenberg block enhancementsTemplate libraryDrag and drop page builder
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPJavaScriptjQueryGoogle FontsFontAwesomeLitespeed Cache CSSMediaElement.js
Frameworks:
GutenbergGutentor plugin
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • No inline scripts with eval or suspicious code

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Tawk.to live chat
Marketing Tools:
Tawk.to
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:5.78.91.189 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 10 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(expired)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:5.78.91.189
Name Servers:
blair.ns.cloudflare.com
neil.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: _dc-mx.f6cfb29fc723.gutentor.com
SOA:Serial: 2377588218, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:90ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:5.78.91.189 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Gutentor plugin to extend Gutenberg block capabilities. It employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Fonts, FontAwesome icons, and Litespeed cache for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices such as meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is fast with optimized CSS delivery and asynchronous loading of scripts. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on third-party scripts like Tawk.to and Google Analytics, which require ongoing monitoring. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation and implement advanced accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website