Skip to main content

Is h1gallery.com a Scam? Security Check Results - h1gallery.com Reviews

h1gallery.com favicon

Is h1gallery.com Safe? Security Analysis for H1 Gallery

Check if h1gallery.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
FramerUseFathom Analytics
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 3:32:08 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

H1 Gallery is a newly launched website (created April 2024) that curates the best marketing headlines on the internet and offers a weekly newsletter subscription service. The site targets marketing professionals and content creators seeking inspiration and curated marketing content. Technically, the site is built using Framer, a modern web design platform, and uses Fathom Analytics for privacy-focused visitor tracking. The site is hosted under a reputable registrar (NameCheap) with HTTPS enabled, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no direct contact information or social media links are provided, which limits transparency and user trust. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good content relevance and user experience but needs improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

FramerUseFathom Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model revolves around content curation and newsletter distribution, targeting marketing professionals. The site positions itself as a niche content aggregator in the marketing technology sector. It leverages modern web technologies but currently lacks visible trust signals such as certifications or detailed company information. The absence of contact details and policies may hinder user confidence and compliance with regulations like GDPR. The site uses third-party services like Tally for form submissions and Fathom for analytics, indicating a lightweight and privacy-conscious approach. Growth potential depends on expanding trust indicators and compliance measures.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory and a positive security indicator. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS), and a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file. No contact channels for security incidents are provided. The use of third-party scripts (Framer, Fathom, Tally) introduces some risk but no known vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and formal security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

A collection of the best marketing headlines on the internet.

Key Services:
Marketing headline curationWeekly newsletter subscription
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerUseFathom Analytics
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Fathom Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Fathom Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Tally (form submission)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a newly launched marketing headline curation platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(241 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:35.71.142.77, 52.223.52.2
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1726085360, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:124ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, which provides modern design capabilities and responsive layouts. It uses Fathom Analytics for privacy-focused tracking and Tally for form submissions. The site loads external resources from framerusercontent.com and cdn.usefathom.com. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but could be enhanced with structured data. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are technical risks. Hosting appears to be via NameCheap DNS servers, consistent with the registrar. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could be hardened for security and compliance.
Analyze Another Website