Skip to main content

Is haixinglab.com a Scam? Security Check Results - N/A Reviews

N

Is haixinglab.com Safe? Security Analysis for N/A

Check if haixinglab.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdSenseGoogle Ads Partner Scripts
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 11:28:55 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website haixinglab.com is a newly registered domain with minimal content and no clear business description or contact information. The site primarily serves as a placeholder with embedded Google advertising scripts but lacks substantive content or user engagement features. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Ads integration. There is no evidence of a content management system or advanced frameworks. Security posture is weak due to the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms. The domain registration is consistent with a new startup or placeholder site, but the lack of transparency and business information reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile but requires significant improvements in content, security, and compliance to be considered professional and credible.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdSenseGoogle Ads Partner Scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of business information, it is difficult to ascertain market positioning or business model. The site does not disclose any services, target customers, or industry focus. The presence of Google advertising scripts suggests a possible revenue model based on ad monetization. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The domain's recent creation suggests early-stage development or a placeholder status. There are no trust signals such as certifications, testimonials, or contact details to support credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal with no advanced protections detected. The domain lacks DNSSEC, and no security headers are present in the HTML content. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No incident response or security policies are published. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing exposure but also limiting engagement. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms is a compliance gap. Overall, the site is low risk but also low maturity in security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

N/A

Description:

No explicit business description found on the website. The site appears minimalistic with no clear business information or services described.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdSenseGoogle Ads Partner Scripts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSenseGoogle Partner Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Google Ads cookie.js
Marketing Tools:
Google Ads scripts
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is minimalistic with almost no business content or contact information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=0; includeSubDomains; preload"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:haixinglab.com
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:9/27/2025 (56 days)
SANs:*.haixinglab.com, haixinglab.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

45/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 4 days

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
high(expired)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:139.162.174.209, 139.162.181.76, 172.104.149.86, 172.104.251.198
AAAA Records:2a01:7e01::f03c:95ff:fe00:2692, 2a01:7e01::f03c:95ff:fe91:5d91, 2a01:7e01::f03c:95ff:feeb:9d4b, 2a01:7e01::f03c:95ff:feed:783e
Name Servers:
chulin.ns.giantpanda.com
yunzi.ns.giantpanda.com
SOA:Serial: 2013020401, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:90ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with embedded Google advertising scripts. There is no detected CMS or advanced framework. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices but lacks accessibility and SEO best practices. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. The hosting provider is not clearly identified beyond registrar and DNS information. There is technical debt in the form of missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, improving SEO metadata, and enhancing accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website