Skip to main content

Is hausbau.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - HausBau Reviews

hausbau.lv favicon

Is hausbau.lv Safe? Security Analysis for HausBau

Check if hausbau.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPressjQueryOwl CarouselContact Form 7Quform+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:03:31 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

HausBau is a Latvian small business specializing in private home construction services, offering professional building work including foundations, walls, roofs, and floor heating. The company provides free cost estimation services and targets private homeowners in Latvia. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries, featuring good SEO and structured data implementation. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Technically, the site performs moderately well with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for its niche but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryOwl CarouselContact Form 7QuformKirki Customizer

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

HausBau operates in the Latvian real estate construction sector, focusing on private home building. The business model centers on providing construction services with transparent cost estimation, appealing to homeowners seeking reliable and timely building solutions. The website content and testimonials suggest a positive reputation and customer satisfaction. The company appears to be a small local player without visible subsidiaries or parent companies. Marketing and analytics usage is minimal, relying on basic tracking. The absence of terms of service and security policies indicates potential compliance gaps. The business ecosystem is localized with no evident partnerships or extended digital services.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@hausbau.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712540****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is available, limiting transparency on security governance. The site uses popular WordPress plugins but does not indicate active vulnerability management or security hardening. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers to protect against clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

HausBau

Description:

Privātmāju būvniecība piemērotā secībā profesionālu celtniecības speciālistu izpildījumā. Tāmes sastādīšana paredzamajām būvniecības izmaksām BEZMAKSAS 24h.

Key Services:
Private home constructionCost estimationFoundationsWallsRoofsFloor heating
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryOwl CarouselContact Form 7QuformKirki Customizer
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
TunT counter
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
TunT counter
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based small business site for private home construction in Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:192.250.229.38 include:spf.mysecurecloudhost.com ip4:62.212.86.101 ip4:141.95.126.90 +a +mx +ip4:206.189.61.154 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

8 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:192.250.229.38
Name Servers:
ns1.greathosting.netDNS only
ns2.greathosting.netDNS only
ns3.greathosting.netDNS only
ns4.greathosting.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: hausbau.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025061700, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:105ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:192.250.229.38 include:spf.mysecurecloudhost.com ip4:62.212.86.101 ip4:141.95.126.90 +a +mx +ip4:206.189.61.154 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using standard plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Quform for forms, and Owl Carousel for sliders. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site has valid meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. No advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies are detected. The site lacks modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating technical debt in security and privacy compliance.
Analyze Another Website