Is head.com Safe? Security Analysis for head.com
https://head.comCheck if head.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website www.head.com is a commercial retail platform focused on sports equipment and accessories. The site employs modern frontend technologies such as React and integrates payment processing through Adyen Checkout, with customer review functionality powered by Yotpo. The website content is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking, indicating good availability. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as explicit contact information, which impacts compliance and trust. Security headers are not detected, and SSL configuration details are limited, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the site appears legitimate and safe for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security best practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
HEAD operates in the retail sports equipment sector, targeting consumers interested in sports gear. The business model is e-commerce focused, leveraging online sales with integrated payment solutions. The use of Yotpo indicates an emphasis on customer engagement and marketing through reviews. The absence of detailed business information and contact data on the site limits deeper business intelligence insights. The domain's WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for commercial brands but reduces transparency. No suspicious domains or partners were identified from the HTML content.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website uses HTTPS, but no detailed SSL configuration information is available. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report security issues. The integration of third-party services like Adyen and Yotpo introduces dependencies that require monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
poor
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about head.com
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published