Skip to main content

Is helium.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Helium Reviews

helium.com favicon

Is helium.com Safe? Security Analysis for Helium

Check if helium.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
FramerJavaScriptFacebook Pixel
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:35:29 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Helium is a technology company focused on enabling individuals and businesses to build and own decentralized wireless networks. The website presents a professional and modern design built on the Framer platform, targeting users interested in wireless network infrastructure and decentralized connectivity solutions. The business model revolves around empowering network ownership and operation through innovative technology. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and integrates Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of visible privacy and terms of service policies indicate gaps in transparency and compliance. Security posture is weak with no detected security headers or incident response information, which could expose the site to risks. Overall, the website is functional and informative but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and legitimacy verification to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Detected Technologies

FramerJavaScriptFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Helium positions itself as an innovator in the decentralized wireless network space, targeting a niche audience of technology enthusiasts and businesses interested in network infrastructure ownership. The company leverages a decentralized business model that potentially disrupts traditional wireless network providers. The website content is focused on promoting this vision but lacks detailed business information such as company founding year, physical location, or contact details. The use of Facebook Pixel indicates active marketing efforts. The absence of WHOIS data and contact information limits the ability to fully assess business credibility and operational scale. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not disclosed, which may suggest a lean organizational structure or limited public disclosures.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, and there is no visible SSL/TLS configuration data to confirm HTTPS enforcement. The lack of privacy policy and incident response contact information further weakens the security and compliance posture. The presence of tracking pixels without clear privacy disclosures may raise GDPR compliance concerns. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are evident. These gaps expose the site to potential risks including data leakage, phishing, or unauthorized tracking. Immediate improvements in security headers, SSL enforcement, privacy policies, and incident response mechanisms are recommended to mitigate risks and build user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies clearly accessible on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Helium

Description:

Helium allows anyone to build and own massive wireless networks.

Key Services:
Wireless network buildingNetwork ownershipDecentralized connectivity solutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerJavaScriptFacebook Pixel
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
CookieYes
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:mailgun.org include:_spf.google.com include:mktomail.com include:stspg-customer.com include:shops.shopify.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+mdo9hnaleku@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(106 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.161.6, 31.43.160.6
Name Servers:
conrad.ns.cloudflare.com
faye.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2382311765, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:211ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:mailgun.org include:_spf.google.com include:mktomail.com include:stspg-customer.com include:shops.shopify.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Framer CMS platform, leveraging modern web fonts and JavaScript libraries. It integrates Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing tracking and uses CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags and Open Graph data present. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. The absence of security headers and WHOIS data indicates technical debt in security and domain management. Opportunities exist to enhance technical robustness by improving security configurations, adding structured data for SEO, and expanding accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website