Skip to main content

Is hellomoon.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Hello Moon Reviews

H

Is hellomoon.io Safe? Security Analysis for Hello Moon

Check if hellomoon.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsDynamic Theming+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:49:03 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Hello Moon is a technology platform specializing in blockchain infrastructure, staking services, and data analytics focused primarily on the Solana ecosystem and other blockchains like Avalanche, Sei, and Movement. The company targets developers, NFT and DeFi investors, and traders by providing powerful developer tools, real-time analytics, and staking solutions. Their market position is strengthened by partnerships with reputable organizations such as Messari, Solana Foundation, and The Block, positioning them as a leading developer platform in the blockchain space. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies and a professional design, indicating a medium-sized enterprise with a strong focus on user experience and developer engagement. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data due to privacy protection limits direct verification of domain ownership details.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsDynamic ThemingFontsource (DM Sans, Inter)Sentry (error monitoring)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Hello Moon operates a platform-as-a-service business model offering blockchain analytics, staking, and developer tools. Their revenue streams likely include subscription or usage fees for data services and staking infrastructure. The company targets technically sophisticated users such as blockchain developers and institutional investors in NFTs and DeFi. Their ecosystem includes partnerships with major blockchain projects and analytics firms, enhancing credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include a well-structured website, active social media presence, and integration with multiple blockchains. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding blockchain support and enhancing data-driven decision-making tools for their users.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of modern frameworks and error monitoring via Sentry indicates proactive security management. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response contact, and vulnerability disclosure program represents gaps in formal security governance. Privacy compliance is partial, with a comprehensive privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by formalizing incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a visible cookie consent banner to enhance privacy compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Hello Moon

Description:

Hello Moon provides innovative datasets on Solana to empower NFT & DeFi investors & traders. They deliver industry-leading blockchain infrastructure, staking services, and data solutions with unmatched reliability and performance.

Key Services:
Blockchain infrastructureStaking servicesNFT & DeFi data analyticsDeveloper tools and APIs
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsDynamic ThemingFontsource (DM Sans, Inter)Sentry (error monitoring)
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerSentry
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Hotjar
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 312-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(312-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 23 days

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
high(22 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:52.85.49.12, 52.85.49.22, 52.85.49.92, 52.85.49.105
Name Servers:
ns-1276.awsdns-31.org
ns-152.awsdns-19.com
ns-1743.awsdns-25.co.uk
ns-870.awsdns-44.net
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:225ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, leveraging Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking, and Sentry for error monitoring. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with fast loading times and good SEO practices. The infrastructure appears robust, supporting video backgrounds and dynamic theming. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Technical risks are minimal, but the lack of cookie consent and formal security disclosures are areas for improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable platform.
Analyze Another Website