Skip to main content

Is hextrust.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Hex Trust Reviews

hextrust.com favicon

Is hextrust.com Safe? Security Analysis for Hex Trust

Check if hextrust.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHAWebflow CMSFinsweet Cookie Consent+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:06:49 PM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Hex Trust is a regulated institutional digital asset service provider specializing in custody, staking, and markets services tailored for builders, investors, and service providers in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space. The company positions itself as a leader in digital asset solutions, emphasizing regulatory compliance and institutional-grade security. Their platform supports a broad range of blockchain protocols and assets, reflecting a comprehensive service offering for institutional clients. Technically, Hex Trust leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and advanced bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA and Cloudflare Turnstile. The website is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies demonstrates attention to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, Hex Trust exhibits strong controls evidenced by SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II certifications and multiple regulatory licenses across key jurisdictions such as Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore, Italy, and France. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy or incident response page suggests areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Hex Trust presents a high level of business credibility and trustworthiness, supported by strong partnerships and client testimonials. The lack of WHOIS data is a minor concern but is mitigated by the company's transparent regulatory and certification disclosures. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a formal security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHAWebflow CMSFinsweet Cookie ConsentCloudflare Turnstile

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Hex Trust operates in the institutional digital asset custody and services sector, targeting financial institutions, protocols, and foundations. Their business model revolves around providing regulated custody, staking, and market services, positioning themselves as a bridge between traditional finance and the digital asset ecosystem. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem including major blockchain projects and financial technology firms, which enhances their market credibility and reach. Growth indicators include recent strategic investments and expansions into new blockchain protocols. Their revenue streams likely derive from custody fees, staking services, and OTC market operations. Hex Trust's competitive advantage lies in its regulatory compliance, institutional-grade security certifications, and broad asset support.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Hex Trust demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of reCAPTCHA for form protection, and SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II certifications indicating robust internal controls. The company maintains regulatory licenses in multiple jurisdictions, underscoring compliance rigor. However, the website lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No direct security contact or incident response information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure program is evident. Data protection practices appear sound with cookie consent and privacy policy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies and improving header configurations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Hex Trust

Description:

Regulated institutional digital asset custody, staking and markets services for builders, investors and service providers.

Key Services:
CustodyStakingMarkets
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHAWebflow CMSFinsweet Cookie ConsentCloudflare Turnstile
Platforms:
Webflow
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with opt-in
  • SOC 1 and SOC 2 certifications indicating strong internal controls

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsAhrefs Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Finsweet Cookie Consent
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.sumsub.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:4972987.spf07.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1408-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports@hextrust.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc-reports@hextrust.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 22 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:13.49.111.177, 51.21.126.187, 16.16.119.222
Name Servers:
alexa.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
nico.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382385813, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.sumsub.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:4972987.spf07.hubspotemail.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and tag management. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and CDN usage. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed. The use of Cloudflare Turnstile and Google reCAPTCHA enhances bot protection. However, the absence of explicit security headers and limited visible server-side security configurations suggest opportunities for technical hardening. The technical stack supports scalability and interoperability, aligning with the company's institutional service offerings.
Analyze Another Website