Skip to main content

Is highlight.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Highlight Reviews

highlight.xyz favicon

Is highlight.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Highlight

Check if highlight.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsMantine UIAWS DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:58:56 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Highlight.xyz is a technology platform specializing in the creation and collection of NFTs, focusing on digital art and culture. The website presents a modern, well-designed interface built with contemporary web technologies such as React and Next.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The platform targets NFT creators and collectors, offering tools to easily create NFT projects and explore digital collectibles. While the technical infrastructure is solid and the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, the website lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security best practices such as security headers and DNSSEC. These gaps present compliance and trust challenges that should be addressed to enhance user confidence and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsMantine UIAWS DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the niche NFT market, leveraging blockchain technology to facilitate digital art creation and collection. Its business model revolves around providing a platform for artists and collectors, potentially generating revenue through transaction fees or premium services. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2018, with no publicly disclosed parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of explicit contact details and compliance documentation may limit its appeal to more cautious or regulated customers. The platform's partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, suggesting a focus on organic growth and direct user engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also suggests incomplete compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible, which may impact the platform's ability to handle security incidents effectively.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Highlight

Description:

Highlight is a platform for creating and collecting digital art and culture, focusing on NFT projects and digital collectibles.

Key Services:
NFT project creationNFT collection and marketplace
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsMantine UIAWS DNS
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional NFT platform with clear focus on digital art creation and collection.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 624-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:servers.outfunnel.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(624-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy: quarantine
Aggregate Reports:re+0440a6512106@inbound.dmarcdigests.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:3.174.113.99, 3.174.113.30, 3.174.113.70, 3.174.113.42
Name Servers:
ns-1232.awsdns-26.orgDNS only
ns-1945.awsdns-51.co.ukDNS only
ns-687.awsdns-21.netDNS only
ns-71.awsdns-08.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:90ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:servers.outfunnel.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with Mantine UI components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure suggests reliable uptime and scalability. Performance appears moderate with preloaded fonts and CSS, and mobile optimization is good. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization could be improved with more comprehensive meta tags and structured data. No CMS was detected, implying a custom or headless architecture. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts in the provided content suggests minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy best practices but may limit marketing insights.
Analyze Another Website