Skip to main content

Is hin.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - Health Info Net AG (HIN) Reviews

hin.ch favicon

Is hin.ch Safe? Security Analysis for Health Info Net AG (HIN)

https://hin.ch

Check if hin.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareSwitzerlandmedium
JavaScriptMatomo AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerBootstrapCONTENS CMS
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 4:30:23 AM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Health Info Net AG (HIN) is a Swiss company specializing in secure communication services tailored for healthcare professionals. Established in 2003, it has positioned itself as the standard provider for secure email, identity management, electronic signatures, messaging, and document sharing within the Swiss healthcare sector. The company operates multiple offices in Switzerland and offers membership-based access to its trusted communication network, the HIN Community. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence with multi-language support and clear service offerings.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptMatomo AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerBootstrapCONTENS CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

HIN's market position as a trusted provider in the Swiss healthcare communication space is reinforced by its ISO 27001 certification and extensive service portfolio. Its business model revolves around memberships, providing secure communication tools and services to healthcare professionals and organizations. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with dedicated support, status, and community portals. Growth indicators include active blog updates and new service offerings like Swiss HealthAssist. The company targets healthcare professionals requiring compliance with data protection and secure communication standards.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, ISO 27001 certification, and secure handling of sensitive patient data. Security best practices such as cookie consent, encrypted email services, and secure access mechanisms are evident. However, the absence of explicit incident response contact details and a vulnerability disclosure policy represents an area for improvement. The use of modern analytics tools is balanced with privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security posture aligns well with the sensitive nature of healthcare data and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish explicit incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Health Info Net AG (HIN)

Description:

Die Health Info Net AG ist Standard für sichere Kommunikation und den Schutz sensibler Patientendaten im Gesundheitswesen.

Key Services:
HIN MailHIN IdentitätHIN SignHIN TalkHIN FileboxSwiss HealthAssist
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptMatomo AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerBootstrapCONTENS CMS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of ISO 27001 certified ISMS
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with required fields

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
MatomoGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spfip.aspectra.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:195.15.222.163
Name Servers:
ns-1240.awsdns-27.orgDNS only
ns-1774.awsdns-29.co.ukDNS only
ns-476.awsdns-59.comDNS only
ns-613.awsdns-12.netDNS only
MX Records:
5: mx1.hin.ch
5: mx2.hin.ch
10: mx3.hin.ch
10: mx4.hin.ch
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:43ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spfip.aspectra.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on CONTENS CMS 5.7.8 and leverages modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, JavaScript for interactivity, and Matomo alongside Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve user experience. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure online presence suitable for a healthcare-focused organization.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about hin.ch

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website