Is historypin.org Safe? Security Analysis for Historypin Community Interest Company
Check if historypin.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Historypin Community Interest Company operates a well-established online platform dedicated to connecting communities through sharing local history photos and stories. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface built on AngularJS and jQuery, integrating Google Maps and various third-party services such as AddThis, Google Analytics, and Intercom for enhanced user engagement and analytics. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly stated and GDPR compliant, reflecting a strong commitment to user data protection. However, explicit security policies and headers are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security transparency. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, but the website's maturity and consistent branding indicate legitimacy. Overall, the platform serves a niche non-profit sector focused on cultural heritage and community engagement.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Historypin positions itself as a community-driven platform targeting libraries, archives, museums, and local history enthusiasts. Its business model revolves around user-generated content and curated collections, fostering social connections through shared historical narratives. The platform leverages partnerships with cultural institutions and maintains a presence through its about.historypin.org domain. While revenue streams are not explicit, the non-profit nature suggests funding through grants or donations. The use of modern web technologies and marketing tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests reliance on web forms for communication, which is typical for community platforms.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA on its signup forms, enhancing protection against automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies demonstrate compliance with data protection regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate risks. The platform would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and implementing additional HTTP security headers to strengthen its security posture.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Historypin Community Interest Company
Historypin is a platform for people to share photos and stories to tell the histories of their local communities.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
- Google reCAPTCHA on signup form
- Cookie consent banner
- Intercom user tracking with hashed user IDs
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak X-Frame-Options configuration
LOWCurrent value: "ALLOWALL"
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 83 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings