Skip to main content

Is hobartservice.co.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - hobartservice.co.uk Reviews

H

Is hobartservice.co.uk Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if hobartservice.co.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:00:10 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website hobartservice.co.uk currently presents only a security verification page employing Google reCAPTCHA v3, indicating the presence of a web application firewall or bot mitigation mechanism. This prevents access to any substantive website content, including business information, contact details, or policies. The domain is registered since 2009 with a reputable UK registrar, 123-Reg Limited, suggesting a potentially established business presence. However, the lack of accessible content limits the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or digital maturity. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap 5.3.3 and Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks visible security headers or privacy compliance indicators. The security posture is moderate due to HTTPS implied by reCAPTCHA but is hindered by the absence of other security best practices. Overall, the site’s risk profile is elevated due to inaccessibility and lack of transparency, requiring further investigation or direct contact for comprehensive evaluation.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security verification page blocking access, no direct business intelligence data such as company description, target audience, business model, or market positioning could be extracted. The domain age suggests a long-standing registration, but no evidence of active business operations or digital presence is visible. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or certifications are disclosed. The lack of contact information and policies further limits business credibility assessment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 as a bot mitigation tool, which is a positive security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided HTML. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The security verification page itself suggests a proactive approach to mitigate automated attacks, but the lack of accessible content prevents a full security audit. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified, but the limited content restricts comprehensive analysis.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and expose a full website beyond the security verification page to allow proper business and security assessment.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is a security verification page with Google reCAPTCHA invisible challenge, indicating a WAF or bot protection mechanism blocking direct access to content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • HTTPS implied by reCAPTCHA integration

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible beyond a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA v3

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(249 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.127
Name Servers:
ns51.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns52.domaincontrol.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025091700, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:48ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection, indicating use of modern frontend technologies. Hosting is via 123-Reg Limited, a known UK registrar and hosting provider. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. The presence of a security verification page suggests a layered security approach but also indicates potential technical debt or configuration issues preventing direct content access. No CMS or backend technologies could be identified from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website