Skip to main content

Is holepunch.to a Scam? Security Check Results - Holepunch, S.A. de C.V. Reviews

holepunch.to favicon

Is holepunch.to Safe? Security Analysis for Holepunch, S.A. de C.V.

Check if holepunch.to is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyMexicosmall
JavaScriptStatic site assets (CSS, JS)
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:45:39 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Holepunch, S.A. de C.V. operates the website holepunch.to, positioning itself as a technology company specializing in peer-to-peer (P2P) application development platforms and tools. The company offers modular JavaScript components and a P2P runtime environment called Pear, enabling developers to build decentralized applications without servers. Their product suite includes encrypted communication apps such as Keet, targeting developers and end-users seeking privacy-focused, serverless solutions. The company appears to be a small-sized technology firm based in Mexico with a clear niche in P2P software development.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptStatic site assets (CSS, JS)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Holepunch maintains a focused market position within the P2P technology sector, leveraging open web technologies to simplify app deployment and scaling. Their business model centers on providing development tools and runtime environments that reduce operational overhead for developers. The company actively promotes community engagement through documentation, social media, and recruitment channels. Partnerships with Pear and Keet indicate a growing ecosystem around their core technology. The absence of physical addresses and phone numbers suggests a primarily digital and remote operational model.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@holepunch.to

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted transport, but lacks visible advanced security headers and published security policies. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. However, the absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement in security transparency and readiness. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, policies, and incident response information.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and vulnerability disclosure page.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Holepunch, S.A. de C.V.

Description:

Holepunch is a platform for creating apps that don’t use any servers whatsoever. No arbitrary limits just better apps that can be shipped instantly, directly to your users.

Key Services:
P2P app development modulesPear P2P runtime and deployment toolKeet encrypted communication app
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptStatic site assets (CSS, JS)
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URL https://holepunch.to/)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 87 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:holepunch.to
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:12/1/2025 (87 days)
SANs:holepunch.to, *.holepunch.to

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:172.64.150.11, 104.18.37.245
AAAA Records:2606:4700:4403::6812:25f5, 2606:4700:440c::ac40:960b
Name Servers:
rick.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
vera.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382455806, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:46ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript technologies, likely React, with static assets served efficiently. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified. Performance is moderate with no broken elements detected. SEO is basic but present through meta descriptions and structured navigation links. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical risks are low, but the lack of security headers and policies presents an opportunity for modernization and risk reduction.
Analyze Another Website